Part of the regional summary: Kenya

Bofa, in Kilifi, had severe bleaching (88% of hard coral tissue) across massive domes, brain corals, and branching colonies, while the foliose Turbinaria plates kept the most color. This site's real story is crown-of-thorns predation: at least nine individual starfish (probably ten) were confirmed across the photographs, repeatedly found draped directly onto already-bleached coral. Published cover was 32%.
Bofa, huko Kilifi, ilikuwa na upaukaji mkali (88% ya tishu za matumbawe magumu) katika kuba kubwa, matumbawe ya ubongo, na makoloni ya matawi, huku mabamba bapa ya majani ya Turbinaria yakibaki na rangi zaidi. Hadithi halisi ya eneo hili ni uwindaji wa samaki nyota taji la miiba: angalau nyota tisa tofauti (huenda kumi) zilithibitishwa katika picha, mara kwa mara zikikutwa zimejilaza moja kwa moja juu ya matumbawe ambayo tayari yamepauka. Ufunikaji uliochapishwa ulikuwa 32%.
Tafsiri ya muhtasari huu kwa AI; Kiingereza ndicho kinachotumika rasmi.
One other CRD dive site with its own page within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
5 of the 21 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
The full photo set shows water clearer than at neighboring Kilifi Bay, a blue-green rather than gray cast, and a genuine hardground-and-boulder reef with relief, broken by clean sand channels and sand-floored gaps between rock.
The community is mixed and structurally intact. Massive Porites domes and lobate colonies, meandroid Platygyra brains, broad monospecific stands of foliose Turbinaria, corymbose and digitate Acropora, Pocillopora, encrusting Montipora plates, favids, and cream Sarcophyton leathers all recur across the set. The rock between colonies is heavily carpeted in dark red fleshy macroalgae and turf, with green Halimeda-type patches.
On bleaching, the massive corals were not spared. The most completely bleached colonies at this site are massive ones. A meter-plus Porites dome is bleached porcelain-white across its whole surface with two brown patches where tissue is already gone; a second large massive Porites is stark white in another of Anderson's own frames; and further white massive and lobate colonies appear in six more frames (e.g., Image 1).
A close-up of one massive Porites shows it white except for a single narrow band of retained brown. The Platygyra brains follow the same pattern rather than resisting it: one large brain has gone uniformly pale gray-white, another is split roughly two-thirds bleached and one-third olive-brown, and a third is white with algal patches. A minority of massive colonies did hold pigment, and they are worth naming because they are the exception, not the rule: a salmon-brown Porites sitting immediately beside a pale one, a mottled mauve-brown dome, a tan Porites, a cream-tan lobate colony, a fully pink Platygyra, and a mauve-pink knobby colony. The group that most conspicuously kept its color at Bofa was the foliose Turbinaria. Olive, tan, and gold plate stands run through five frames, and another is a broad olive-tan Turbinaria field with only one white colony in it. So the reef does read two-tier: the plates held pigment better than the boulders. Acropora sits with the boulders on the losing side, mostly bone-white, some pale cream-yellow, and only occasionally still pink or tan (including the pigment gradient visible within one stand) (e.g., Image 2).
One frame shows a pale colony with a crescent-shaped, turf-covered dead patch edged by a dark band where the colony is broken: physical damage (Anderson's reading), not disease (e.g., Image 21).
Crown-of-thorns predation is the site's real story, and the 95 reviewed frames settle its scale. Acanthaster appear in 14 of the 95 frames reviewed, and at least nine distinct individuals can be confirmed — probably ten. Two frames each hold two animals at once: one has a seastar above and one below the same white bleached corymbose Acropora, and the other has two on the reef beneath a bleached Acropora stand. The rest are separable by scene and color morph, which ranges from dark maroon and purple with blue-gray banded arms to olive-black with pale spines (e.g., Image 3).
They are repeatedly found on or against bleached tissue — on a stark white plate, beside a white dome (e.g., Image 4), hard against white Acropora — which is predation stacked on top of thermal stress rather than either alone.
Typical recent thermal stress: mean annual maximum of 4.9 degree heating weeks (2021-2025, NOAA CRW; Kenya virtual station). Seawater here was an estimated 31.3°C during the survey (read from the TG7 underwater camera and not validated, per Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1; the Kenya survey-wide mean of 32.0°C matched the 1998 event), and NOAA recorded a peak of 13.5 degree-heating weeks on 18 April 2024, the highest for Kenya since records began in 1985. For the 2024 Kenya survey as a whole, Mayfield (2025, Environments 12:276) estimated that in situ temperatures ran about 1.3°C above NOAA's, so that "nearly 22 DHWs may actually have transpired"; those in situ readings came from the TG7 underwater camera and have not been validated.
Several other seastars in the set are not Acanthaster: smooth five-armed salmon and orange species in six frames, and blue Linckia laevigata in two frames. Other fauna recorded: aggregated black Diadema urchins under a pigmented overhang and on the reef top; a spotted sea cucumber; a bright orange gastropod among the red macroalgae; small red-and-white gobies sheltering in a bleached Acropora; a loose school of fusiliers streaming across the bleached dome; and a large Heteractis-type anemone that is itself pale and cream, still holding anemonefish.
Apart from our own published survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
Dived 26 Mar 2024 off Bofa, Kilifi, during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event. Surveys were run with 3 Degrees South.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Manual (published) | 32.4 | |
| CoralNet | 34.0 | n = 97 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 47.6 | n = 104 |
| CoralSCOP unedited | 26.6 | n = 87 |
The three computer-vision methods disagree by 21.0 pp (26.6–47.6%) and read on both sides of the manual point count (32.4%); the headline is the manual point count because a person's point count of the site's photographs is the reference the models are measured against.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.