Part of the regional summary: Indonesia - Komodo

Anderson dived this Komodo channel in 2009 and returned in 2019 to strong current and thermoclines, passing from dense Acropora thickets and two-meter tables to scoured, soft-coral ground and a sand apron. A longfin batfish, a gliding ray, and a camouflaged ornate ghost pipefish were photographed along the way.
Anderson menyelami kanal Komodo ini pada 2009 dan kembali pada 2019 menghadapi arus kuat dan termoklin, melewati rumpun Acropora yang rapat dan meja selebar dua meter menuju dasar yang tergerus dengan karang lunak dan hamparan pasir. Seekor ikan kelelawar sirip panjang, seekor pari yang meluncur, dan seekor ikan pipa hantu hias yang tersamar terpotret di sepanjang jalan.
Terjemahan ringkasan ini oleh AI; versi bahasa Inggris yang berlaku.
One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
5 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
Frames from across the gallery read as a transect through the habitats Anderson describes. Two are the acroporid community: one wide frame is a dense pale corymbose Acropora thicket in the foreground with several lavender-gray tabulate plates stacked behind it, mustard finger coral above, and olive soft corals between, at near-continuous cover with anthias threading the branches; the other frames two large Acropora tables, the nearer roughly two meters across and brown, the further mustard-tan, above a patch of bare pale rubble, with pink-brown soft-coral carpets and clean sand in the foreground and fusiliers overhead (e.g., Image 4, Image 5).
One frame is the scoured, soft-coral-dominated ground: a longfin batfish hanging over a substrate of pale mint-green Sinularia-type heads on dark red encrusting sponge and coralline rock, with a red-and-yellow sponge and a small anemone, in visibly hazy water and with almost no hard coral in view (e.g., Image 3).
The sand apron shows a whip-tailed ray gliding low over a coarse sand plain dotted with small isolated coral clumps in murky blue-violet light (e.g., Image 2), and the darkly pigmented Pocillopora acuta colony Anderson logged at about 22 m, sitting on the sand and not integrated into the reef matrix, with a small black-and-white damselfish beside it (e.g., Image 1).
Anderson's log records an ornate ghost pipefish at the very end of the dive; it was photographed (photo not shown).
The photo review resolved no bleaching, disease lesions, or predation scars, and nothing man-made appears; however, a computer-vision point count called 0.4% of coral points bleached (1 of 62 photos).
WWF-US and WWF-Indonesia surveyed a nearby station (TNK05), 0.30 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Within 5 km, one independent station, WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia at TNK05, 0.30 km away, read 67% in 2016.
Anderson dived this site in August 2009 and again on 21 January 2019 (15:04, 53 min, max 23.5 m, average 13.1 m, 27.8°C (dive-computer average; the note reads 25.6°C), about 10 m visibility, strong current, and thermoclines).
The 2019 dive, on 21 January, was the third dive of the day. A darkly pigmented Pocillopora acuta colony sat at 22 m, not integrated into the reef matrix. Anderson's log also lists small massive poritids, Tubastraea, a high diversity of mostly small Acropora, Pachyseris, Seriatopora caliendrum/Stylophora pistillata, Pocillopora verrucosa, and a very large snapper. Pocillopora eydouxi was rare, barrel sponges were large, and one area had no coral, only CCA-encrusted rubble. A large nurse shark, the first of the trip, was seen in the distance. Montipora and abundant, diverse Acropora were also present.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 20.9 | n = 62 · SE 1.3 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 33.7 | n = 62 · SE 2.9 |
| Claude (edited photos) | 26.0 | n = 62 · SE 3.1 |
The two computer-vision methods disagree by 12.8 pp (20.9–33.7%) and read on both sides of Claude's blind point count (26.0%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
| Date | Time in | Max depth (m) | Bottom time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-08-14 | 11:00 | 22.9 | 69 |
| 2019-01-21 | 15:04 | 23.5 | 53 |
Coral Reef Diagnostics surveyWithin 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2016. The most recent nearby survey is from 2016, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own pooled estimate (26%) sits 41 points below the one nearby survey station (67%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia | TNK05 | 2016 | 67% | 0.30 km | Amkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2016. Komodo MPA. MERMAID |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.