Coral Reef Diagnostics

Indonesia - Komodo NP: The Cauldron / Shotgun

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2009-08-14
2019-01-21
Coordinates
-8.4609, 119.5634
Coral cover
26%
Claude computer vision (62 edited photos) · other methods below · median 21%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — East Nusa Tenggara virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoEast Nusa Tenggara (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
63
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Anderson dived this Komodo channel in 2009 and returned in 2019 to strong current and thermoclines, passing from dense Acropora thickets and two-meter tables to scoured, soft-coral ground and a sand apron. A longfin batfish, a gliding ray, and a camouflaged ornate ghost pipefish were photographed along the way.

Max. depth dived
23.5 m
Water temp. during survey
27.8°Cii (dive note: 25.6°C)
-0.6°C vs the 2019 mean sea temperature (28.4°C)
ii Logged water temperature of the dive (dive-computer average), 21 January 2019 (dive log); Anderson's note reads 25.6°C, the dive computer's minimum.

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

5 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

67891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

Frames from across the gallery read as a transect through the habitats Anderson describes. Two are the acroporid community: one wide frame is a dense pale corymbose Acropora thicket in the foreground with several lavender-gray tabulate plates stacked behind it, mustard finger coral above, and olive soft corals between, at near-continuous cover with anthias threading the branches; the other frames two large Acropora tables, the nearer roughly two meters across and brown, the further mustard-tan, above a patch of bare pale rubble, with pink-brown soft-coral carpets and clean sand in the foreground and fusiliers overhead (e.g., Image 4, Image 5).

One frame is the scoured, soft-coral-dominated ground: a longfin batfish hanging over a substrate of pale mint-green Sinularia-type heads on dark red encrusting sponge and coralline rock, with a red-and-yellow sponge and a small anemone, in visibly hazy water and with almost no hard coral in view (e.g., Image 3).

The sand apron shows a whip-tailed ray gliding low over a coarse sand plain dotted with small isolated coral clumps in murky blue-violet light (e.g., Image 2), and the darkly pigmented Pocillopora acuta colony Anderson logged at about 22 m, sitting on the sand and not integrated into the reef matrix, with a small black-and-white damselfish beside it (e.g., Image 1).

Anderson's log records an ornate ghost pipefish at the very end of the dive; it was photographed (photo not shown).

Coral cover

Stressors

The photo review resolved no bleaching, disease lesions, or predation scars, and nothing man-made appears; however, a computer-vision point count called 0.4% of coral points bleached (1 of 62 photos).

Comparisons with other data

WWF-US and WWF-Indonesia surveyed a nearby station (TNK05), 0.30 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Within 5 km, one independent station, WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia at TNK05, 0.30 km away, read 67% in 2016.

Dive record

Anderson dived this site in August 2009 and again on 21 January 2019 (15:04, 53 min, max 23.5 m, average 13.1 m, 27.8°C (dive-computer average; the note reads 25.6°C), about 10 m visibility, strong current, and thermoclines).

Other notes

The 2019 dive, on 21 January, was the third dive of the day. A darkly pigmented Pocillopora acuta colony sat at 22 m, not integrated into the reef matrix. Anderson's log also lists small massive poritids, Tubastraea, a high diversity of mostly small Acropora, Pachyseris, Seriatopora caliendrum/Stylophora pistillata, Pocillopora verrucosa, and a very large snapper. Pocillopora eydouxi was rare, barrel sponges were large, and one area had no coral, only CCA-encrusted rubble. A large nurse shark, the first of the trip, was seen in the distance. Montipora and abundant, diverse Acropora were also present.

CV model comparison

Mean 26%, median 21% across 62 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv320.9n = 62 · SE 1.3
CoralSCOP edited33.7n = 62 · SE 2.9
Claude (edited photos)26.0n = 62 · SE 3.1

The two computer-vision methods disagree by 12.8 pp (20.9–33.7%) and read on both sides of Claude's blind point count (26.0%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Dive history

DateTime inMax depth (m)Bottom time (min)
2009-08-1411:0022.969
2019-01-2115:0423.553

Independent surveys nearby

Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series. The Coral Reef Diagnostics point is the 21 January 2019 dive, a blind Claude computer-vision point count of 62 edited photographs (the site's headline value) rather than a transect. No underwater photographs survive from the 2009 dive, so that visit has no value.
0%17%34%51%68%20162019WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia 2016: 67%Coral Reef Diagnostics survey 2019: 26%
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia Coral Reef Diagnostics survey

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2016. The most recent nearby survey is from 2016, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own pooled estimate (26%) sits 41 points below the one nearby survey station (67%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WWF-US / WWF-IndonesiaTNK05201667%0.30 kmAmkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2016. Komodo MPA. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.