Part of the regional summary: Indonesia - Komodo

Anderson logged this Komodo channel as his best dive ever in 2009 and returned in 2019 to strong current and thermoclines, passing from dense Acropora thickets and two-meter tables to scoured, soft-coral ground and a sand apron. A longfin batfish, a gliding ray, and a camouflaged ornate ghost pipefish were photographed along the way.
Anderson menyelami lokasi ini pada Agustus 2009 — saat itu dicatat sebagai penyelaman terbaiknya — dan kembali pada 21 Januari 2019 (15:04, 53 menit, kedalaman maksimum 23.5 m, rata-rata 13.1 m, 25.6 derajat C, jarak pandang sekitar 10 m, arus kuat, dan termoklin).
Terjemahan ringkasan ini oleh AI; versi bahasa Inggris yang berlaku. Translated from the site’s shorter map summary.
One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Four other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
5 of these 50 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
The five frames read as a transect through the habitats he describes. Two are the acroporid community: one wide frame is a dense pale corymbose Acropora thicket in the foreground with several lavender-gray tabulate plates stacked behind it, mustard finger coral above, and olive soft corals between, at near-continuous cover with anthias threading the branches; the other frames two large Acropora tables, the nearer roughly two meters across and brown, the further mustard-tan, above a patch of bare pale rubble, with pink-brown soft-coral carpets and clean sand in the foreground and fusiliers overhead (e.g., Image 4, Image 5).
One frame is the scoured, soft-coral-dominated ground: a longfin batfish hanging over a substrate of pale mint-green Sinularia-type heads on dark red encrusting sponge and coralline rock, with a red-and-yellow sponge and a small anemone, in visibly hazy water and with almost no hard coral in view (e.g., Image 3).
The sand apron gives the other two: a whip-tailed ray gliding low over a coarse sand plain dotted with small isolated coral clumps in murky blue-violet light, and a close frame of a camouflaged ghost pipefish tucked against dark algal clumps on shell sand beside a small black-and-white damselfish - his log records an ornate ghost pipefish at the very end of that dive (e.g., Image 1, Image 2).
Coral cover: 26% — a blind Claude computer-vision point count of 62 of Anderson's edited photographs (20 points per photo; water, fish, and obstructions excluded). Other computer-vision methods are listed in the method table. These are computer-vision indices over photographs, not a diver transect, and each averages across acroporid thicket, scoured soft-coral pavement, and open sand.
No bleaching, disease lesions, or predation scars are resolvable, and nothing man-made appears.
Also on record for this site: 2019-1-21 dive 3: Shotgun/Cauldron (#10). I did this dive in 2009 and it was one of my favorite dives I’d ever done. Darkly pigmented Pocillopora acuta @ 22 m (not integrated into reef matrix). Small massive poritids, Tubastrea, high diversity of mostly small Acropora, Pachyseris, Seriatopora caliendrum/Stylophora pistillata, monster snapper, Pocillopora verrucosa. Pocillopora eydouxi=rare, large barrel sponges, encountered area with no coral, only CCA-encrusted rubble. Large nurse shark in the distance (first of trip). Montipora, among the most impressive Acropora of the trip-abundant and diverse.
Anderson dived this site in August 2009 - logged at the time as his best dive ever - and again on 21 January 2019 (15:04, 53 min, max 23.5 m, average 13.1 m, 25.6 degrees C, about 10 m visibility, strong current, and thermoclines).
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 20.9 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 33.7 |
| Claude (edited photos) | 26.0 |
Coral Reef Diagnostics surveyWithin 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2016. The most recent nearby survey is from 2016, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own pooled estimate (26%) sits 41.3 points below the range of these surveys (67%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia | TNK05 | 2016 | 67% | 2.25 km | Amkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2016. Komodo MPA. MERMAID |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.