Coral Reef Diagnostics

Indonesia - Komodo NP: Siaba Kecil

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2009-08-16
2019-01-19
2019-01-26
Coordinates
-8.5412, 119.6432
Coral cover
25%
Claude computer vision (72 edited photos) · other methods below · median 17%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — East Nusa Tenggara virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoEast Nusa Tenggara (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
94
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Siaba Kecil in Komodo National Park is a current-flattened reef almost entirely plastered in living coral, with vast Acropora meadows and tables, plus carpets of soft coral. Turtles, a small manta, and an anemone roughly 1 m across add to the dive, though few large fish suggest overfishing.

Max. depth dived
24.1 m
Water temp. during survey
26.4°Cii
-1.9°C vs the 2019 mean sea temperature (28.3°C)
ii Mean of the dive-computer averages of the two 2019 dives (26.1°C on 19 January, 26.7°C on 26 January; dive log); the dive computer's minimum was 25.6°C on both.
More infoNo temperature was recorded for the 2009 dive.
Bottom time
57 min

Six independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Ten other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

6 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444647484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

A low-rugosity reef — flattened by the high current — but almost completely plastered in living cover. Anderson recorded extremely high coral cover at 15 m, maybe 80–90%, and 50–60% cover at 15 m on the second dive. Acropora is the defining genus. Large areas of 100% Acropora cover at 15 m, massive swaths at 7–8 m, beautiful Acropora meadows in the shallows, and high Acropora diversity overall. One wide frame is a continuous branching Acropora thicket running to the limit of visibility (e.g., Image 5).

Some areas are dominated by plating Acropora, with occasional large Acropora tables — one photographed table is over a meter across, olive-green with a clean white growing margin and structurally intact (e.g., Image 2).

Large areas of Acropora crusts (encrusting basal plates) are noted, and encrusting Isopora (species uncertain) was recorded. Pocilloporids are well represented: Pocillopora verrucosa, Pocillopora eydouxi, Stylophora pistillata, small Seriatopora hystrix (common on the second dive), and Seriatopora caliendrum. The first Pocillopora acuta of the trip was seen here and several more followed as the dive progressed; it was relatively common in places. Pigmentation was very dark. A close-up frame shows a pocilloporid so heavily pigmented it reads near-black, its verrucae picked out only by pale polyp tips (e.g., Image 1).

Nearly all Seriatopora caliendrum colonies were fluorescent green. Also recorded: Montipora, finger Porites, Porites rus, Pachyseris, Plerogyra, Galaxea, and meandroid brain corals visible in the wide frames. Most of this hard coral is overgrowing crustose-coralline-algae-consolidated rubble rather than sitting on solid reef framework — the pavement between colonies is visibly pink and magenta with coralline crusts. There is an interesting mix of hard and soft coral at 20 m, and several areas are blanketed by soft corals. One frame is an unbroken carpet of pulsing xeniid soft coral filling the entire field of view; at 3–4 m there was soft coral as far as the eye could see, at 11 m soft-coral carpets, and at 5–6 m large areas dominated by soft corals with only some Acropora (e.g., Image 4).

The reef was very colorful, albeit scoured: the cryptic substrate carries vivid crimson and magenta encrusting sponges, tunicates, bushy black hydroids or gorgonians, and green calcareous algae, and the coral is interspersed with beautiful sponges including maroon tube sponges (e.g., Image 3).

Coral cover

Stressors

On the 26 January dive (northeast side; no photographs), Anderson logged slimy algae, potentially cyanobacteria, in some areas at 3–6 m, and red and brown algae in some areas. On the 19 January dive, one frame shows a dark, filamentous mat (algae or possibly cyanobacteria) blanketing a patch of dead branching coral beside living colonies (e.g., Image 45).

Stinging hydroids are present. Evidence of over-fishing was noted — many small reef fish but few large ones, with a single large barracuda the exception. Standing dead Acropora skeleton is visible in the wide frames, still holding branch shape but overgrown with yellow-green turf and encrusting growth, sitting immediately below the living thicket. Small reef fish were seen living in Acropora with what appeared to be isopod parasites attached to the head. No bleaching was recorded on any of these dives, although a computer-vision point count called 1.0% of coral points bleached (2 of 72 photos). No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.

Fish and other fauna

Large angelfish and giant trevally on the first dive; one large barracuda on the second. Turtles on both dives, and a small manta ray on 26 Jan. A very large anemone, roughly 1 m in diameter. Lionfish, very common here. The first moray of the trip was seen on this dive. A giant clam, and spectacular small reef-fish life at 4 m. The wide frames are busy with anthias, small damselfish, and butterflyfish working the Acropora meadow, plus a loose school of red-and-white fish over the thicket. Tubastraea (the non-symbiotic orange cup coral) is rare here.

Comparisons with other data

Reef Check surveyed a nearby station (Mawan (Sector 1)), 0.49 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Within 5 km, six independent stations (Reef Check and WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia) recorded station-year means of 8.8–51% hard coral cover between 2016 and 2020; the nearest, Reef Check at Mawan (Sector 1), 0.49 km away, read a mean of 10% in 2020.

Dive record

Island site in Komodo National Park, dived on 16 Aug 2009 and twice in January 2019 — 19 Jan 2019 (11:02–11:59, 57 min, max depth 21.9 m, 31% oxygen) and 26 Jan 2019 (07:48–08:46, 58 min, max depth 18.3 m, 30% oxygen). Average water temperature 26.1°C on 19 January and 26.7°C on 26 January 2019 (dive computer). The 19 Jan dive was, in Anderson's words, a great hard coral dive, with very high average live coral cover at 5–15 m but limited visibility that varied with depth. On 26 Jan the northeast side was dived instead, which evidently experiences much stronger currents depending on the tides — near-Lembongan-like current at the start, though it caused no problems. On the 19 January dive, strong current drained Anderson's air quickly. Current increased with depth on the first dive, with a coincident drop in visibility; after turning the corner on the second dive, visibility went from 5 m to 20 m and the water warmed. The SD card malfunctioned on 26 Jan, so no photographs exist from that dive; the photographs on this page are from the 19 January 2019 dive.

CV model comparison

Mean 25%, median 17% across 72 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv330.0n = 72 · SE 1.5
CoralSCOP edited39.3n = 72 · SE 2.5
Claude (edited photos)25.4n = 72 · SE 3.1

The two computer-vision methods differ by 9.3 pp (30.0–39.3%) and read 4.6–13.9 pp above Claude's blind point count (25.4%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Reef Check20205 stations, 0.49–2.32 kmRecords ↓
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia20161 station, 2.90 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%201620182020WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia 2016: 40%Reef Check 2020: 8.8%Reef Check 2020: 10%Reef Check 2020: 47%Reef Check 2020: 48%Reef Check 2020: 51%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2019: 25%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (3 years)
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia Reef Check Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 6 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 10 surveys between 2016 and 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (25%) sits within the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (8.8–51%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WWF-US / WWF-IndonesiaTNK06201640%2.90 kmAmkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2016. Komodo MPA. MERMAID
Reef CheckMawan (Sector 1)202010% (3.1–18%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020)0.49 km—
Reef CheckMawan (Sector 2)20208.8%0.49 km—
Reef CheckSiaba Besar (Sector 2)202047% (41–52%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020)0.95 km—
Reef CheckSiaba Besar (Sector 1)202051% (44–59%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020)0.95 km—
Reef CheckPengah Kecil (Sector 1) SW Side202048% (39–57%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020)2.32 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.