Part of the regional summary: Indonesia - Komodo

Anderson found the hard coral cover at this site absolutely stunning: large, very old Acropora colonies, enormous ancient sheets of Pachyseris at 15-20 m, and fluorescent green Stylophora. Several large green turtles, one possibly pregnant, and garden eels on a sand apron added to the dive.
Anderson menilai tutupan karang keras di lokasi ini benar-benar menakjubkan: koloni Acropora yang besar dan sangat tua, lembaran Pachyseris purba yang luas pada kedalaman 15-20 m, serta Stylophora hijau menyala. Beberapa penyu hijau berukuran besar, salah satunya mungkin sedang bunting, dan belut taman di hamparan pasir menambah nilai penyelaman ini.
Terjemahan ringkasan ini oleh AI; versi bahasa Inggris yang berlaku.
Six independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Nine other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
This page shows 50 of the 162 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.
12 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
Coral extended down to 20-22 m. On the first dive (19 January), visibility was 10 m and the water 26-27°C. On the second dive (26 January), visibility was 10 m, with a very mild current.
Acropora formed large, very old colonies (e.g., Image 1).
Stylophora, Seriatopora, Pachyseris, and numerous other lettuce corals were present. The coral assemblage at 5-10 m was particularly rich. Merulina, plating Acropora, bottlebrush Acropora, and Anacropora were present; the water was murky with a high sediment load, many corals were feeding, and there was some Acropora mortality. Enormous, ancient sheets of Pachyseris grew at 15-20 m (e.g., Image 2).
Pocillopora was notably absent. Large areas were dominated by Acropora (e.g., Image 5).
Fluorescent green Stylophora was very common at the site. Some Fungia, Pavona, and massive Porites (though not a major framework builder) were present; fish life was diverse, but average fish size was small (e.g., Image 3).
Soft corals and sea anemones were beautiful, though this was definitely a hard coral-dominated site. Zoanthids and corallimorphs were common. At least five species of soft coral were present. Pocillopora verrucosa finally appeared at the end of the dive, at 6 m. No Pocillopora damicornis or Pocillopora acuta was seen. On the second dive (26 January), the corals included Pocillopora verrucosa, Seriatopora hystrix, Stylophora pistillata, Seriatopora caliendrum, Acropora (diverse and abundant), Pachyseris (dominant in places), and Pavona (including a very large colony). The site was dominated by hard coral and punctuated by large, sandy patches. There were many large, foliaceous coral colonies, only one of which was Pachyseris. Cabbage and lettuce corals grew among many huge branching Acropora colonies. Also recorded were Pavona, large colonies compatible with Euphyllia on the sand (e.g., Image 16, Image 24, Image 51), one Culcita, several species of Galaxea (all small), Montipora, several species of brain coral, Hydnophora, finger Porites, and small massive Porites (uncommon); Pocillopora acuta was notably absent.
There was some Culcita damage, though not much. Anderson's log also notes some Acropora mortality: on the first dive, white sections of branches within otherwise pigmented staghorn thickets are recent mortality, cause not stated (e.g., Image 5).
Several large green turtles were seen, one of which may have been pregnant. Anderson's notes also list pregnant turtles. Garden eels lived in an interesting sand apron. Tiny nudibranchs were seen. A small NBS anemone, some algae in the sand, Dictyota, and some Acropora colonies were also seen. A tiny frogfish and a small mantis shrimp peering out of its burrow (Image 44) were in the sandy area, where we spent the last third of the dive.
The second dive turned up 5-6 large turtles, several sharks resting on the sand, a nurse shark, and a cuttlefish.
Reef Check surveyed a station named Siaba Besar (Sector 1), 1.65 km away. Within 5 km, six independent stations (Reef Check and WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia) recorded station-year means of 8.8–51% hard coral cover between 2016 and 2020; the nearest, Reef Check at Mawan (Sector 1), 0.34 km away, read a mean of 10% in 2020.
The first visit was dive 1 of 19 January 2019 (trip dive 1). It ran from 7:28 to 8:33. Maximum depth was 19.2 m, and the dive lasted 65 minutes. The breathing gas was 33% oxygen. The average water temperature was 26.8°C. It was the first dive of the trip, at a site well known for hard coral. The return visit was dive 3 of 26 January 2019 (trip dive 30), from 15:20 to 16:26 (66 min). Maximum depth was 16.2 m. The average water temperature was 26.9°C. The breathing gas was 30% oxygen. It was our second dive at this amazing site.
The most common soft coral, logged in the water as Sinularia, appears in the photographs as lavender, leathery colonies with smooth, finger-like lobes, compatible with Sinularia (e.g., Image 6).
The photographs show at least two other foliaceous forms: dense stands of thin, upright, contorted fronds with fine ridges parallel to their margins (e.g., Image 13, Image 42), and mounds of thin, frilly plates with a rough, granular surface (e.g., Image 49).
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 31.6 | n = 121 · SE 1.2 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 41.5 | n = 121 · SE 2.4 |
| Claude (edited photos) | 52.9 | n = 121 · SE 2.4 |
The two computer-vision methods differ by 9.9 pp (31.6–41.5%) and read 11.4–21.3 pp below Claude's blind point count (52.9%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
Each visit is analyzed independently; these are not pooled into a single site mean. The two visits read 52–54%, 2 points apart: inside the 7-point method-noise floor, so no difference between them can be read (inconclusive). The visits were 7 days apart, so this is variation between dives, not a change over time.
| Date | % coral cover | Std. dev. | Frames scored |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-19 | 54% | ±26 | 55 |
| 2019-01-26 | 52% | ±27 | 66 |
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reef Check | 2020 | 5 stations, 0.34–1.88 km | Records ↓ |
| WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia | 2016 | 1 station, 3.59 km | Records ↓ |
Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)Within 5 km, 6 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 10 surveys between 2016 and 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (53%) sits 2 points above the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (8.8–51%), inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia | TNK06 | 2016 | 40% | 3.59 km | Amkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2016. Komodo MPA. MERMAID |
| Reef Check | Mawan (Sector 1) | 2020 | 10% (3.1–18%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020) | 0.34 km | — |
| Reef Check | Mawan (Sector 2) | 2020 | 8.8% | 0.34 km | — |
| Reef Check | Siaba Besar (Sector 1) | 2020 | 51% (44–59%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020) | 1.65 km | — |
| Reef Check | Siaba Besar (Sector 2) | 2020 | 47% (41–52%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020) | 1.65 km | — |
| Reef Check | Pengah Kecil (Sector 1) SW Side | 2020 | 48% (39–57%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020) | 1.88 km | — |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.