Coral Reef Diagnostics

Indonesia - Komodo NP: Siaba Besar

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2019-01-19
2019-01-26
Coordinates
-8.5474, 119.6457
Coral cover
53%
Claude computer vision (121 edited photos) · other methods below · median 56%
Observations
predationrecent mortality
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — East Nusa Tenggara virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoEast Nusa Tenggara (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
162
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Anderson found the hard coral cover at this site absolutely stunning: large, very old Acropora colonies, enormous ancient sheets of Pachyseris at 15-20 m, and fluorescent green Stylophora. Several large green turtles, one possibly pregnant, and garden eels on a sand apron added to the dive.

Max. depth dived
19.2 m
Water temp. during survey
26.9°Cii
-1.4°C vs the 2019 mean sea temperature (28.3°C)
ii Mean of the dive-computer average water temperatures of the 2 logged dives (26.8°C on 19 January and 26.9°C on 26 January 2019; dive log); Anderson's note for the first dive reads 26-27°C.

Six independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Nine other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

This page shows 50 of the 162 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.

12 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

478910111214151718192021222325262728293031323334353637383940414345464748

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Coral extended down to 20-22 m. On the first dive (19 January), visibility was 10 m and the water 26-27°C. On the second dive (26 January), visibility was 10 m, with a very mild current.

General benthic features

Acropora formed large, very old colonies (e.g., Image 1).

Stylophora, Seriatopora, Pachyseris, and numerous other lettuce corals were present. The coral assemblage at 5-10 m was particularly rich. Merulina, plating Acropora, bottlebrush Acropora, and Anacropora were present; the water was murky with a high sediment load, many corals were feeding, and there was some Acropora mortality. Enormous, ancient sheets of Pachyseris grew at 15-20 m (e.g., Image 2).

Pocillopora was notably absent. Large areas were dominated by Acropora (e.g., Image 5).

Fluorescent green Stylophora was very common at the site. Some Fungia, Pavona, and massive Porites (though not a major framework builder) were present; fish life was diverse, but average fish size was small (e.g., Image 3).

Soft corals and sea anemones were beautiful, though this was definitely a hard coral-dominated site. Zoanthids and corallimorphs were common. At least five species of soft coral were present. Pocillopora verrucosa finally appeared at the end of the dive, at 6 m. No Pocillopora damicornis or Pocillopora acuta was seen. On the second dive (26 January), the corals included Pocillopora verrucosa, Seriatopora hystrix, Stylophora pistillata, Seriatopora caliendrum, Acropora (diverse and abundant), Pachyseris (dominant in places), and Pavona (including a very large colony). The site was dominated by hard coral and punctuated by large, sandy patches. There were many large, foliaceous coral colonies, only one of which was Pachyseris. Cabbage and lettuce corals grew among many huge branching Acropora colonies. Also recorded were Pavona, large colonies compatible with Euphyllia on the sand (e.g., Image 16, Image 24, Image 51), one Culcita, several species of Galaxea (all small), Montipora, several species of brain coral, Hydnophora, finger Porites, and small massive Porites (uncommon); Pocillopora acuta was notably absent.

Coral cover

Stressors

There was some Culcita damage, though not much. Anderson's log also notes some Acropora mortality: on the first dive, white sections of branches within otherwise pigmented staghorn thickets are recent mortality, cause not stated (e.g., Image 5).

Fish and other fauna

Several large green turtles were seen, one of which may have been pregnant. Anderson's notes also list pregnant turtles. Garden eels lived in an interesting sand apron. Tiny nudibranchs were seen. A small NBS anemone, some algae in the sand, Dictyota, and some Acropora colonies were also seen. A tiny frogfish and a small mantis shrimp peering out of its burrow (Image 44) were in the sandy area, where we spent the last third of the dive.

The second dive turned up 5-6 large turtles, several sharks resting on the sand, a nurse shark, and a cuttlefish.

Comparisons with other data

Reef Check surveyed a station named Siaba Besar (Sector 1), 1.65 km away. Within 5 km, six independent stations (Reef Check and WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia) recorded station-year means of 8.8–51% hard coral cover between 2016 and 2020; the nearest, Reef Check at Mawan (Sector 1), 0.34 km away, read a mean of 10% in 2020.

Dive record

The first visit was dive 1 of 19 January 2019 (trip dive 1). It ran from 7:28 to 8:33. Maximum depth was 19.2 m, and the dive lasted 65 minutes. The breathing gas was 33% oxygen. The average water temperature was 26.8°C. It was the first dive of the trip, at a site well known for hard coral. The return visit was dive 3 of 26 January 2019 (trip dive 30), from 15:20 to 16:26 (66 min). Maximum depth was 16.2 m. The average water temperature was 26.9°C. The breathing gas was 30% oxygen. It was our second dive at this amazing site.

Other notes

The most common soft coral, logged in the water as Sinularia, appears in the photographs as lavender, leathery colonies with smooth, finger-like lobes, compatible with Sinularia (e.g., Image 6).

The photographs show at least two other foliaceous forms: dense stands of thin, upright, contorted fronds with fine ridges parallel to their margins (e.g., Image 13, Image 42), and mounds of thin, frilly plates with a rough, granular surface (e.g., Image 49).

CV model comparison

Mean 53%, median 56% across 121 photos.
More infoA few low-cover photos (sand, rubble, or open bottom) pull the mean down; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv331.6n = 121 · SE 1.2
CoralSCOP edited41.5n = 121 · SE 2.4
Claude (edited photos)52.9n = 121 · SE 2.4

The two computer-vision methods differ by 9.9 pp (31.6–41.5%) and read 11.4–21.3 pp below Claude's blind point count (52.9%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

% coral cover by visit

Each visit is analyzed independently; these are not pooled into a single site mean. The two visits read 52–54%, 2 points apart: inside the 7-point method-noise floor, so no difference between them can be read (inconclusive). The visits were 7 days apart, so this is variation between dives, not a change over time.

Date% coral coverStd. dev.Frames scored
2019-01-1954%±2655
2019-01-2652%±2766

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Reef Check20205 stations, 0.34–1.88 kmRecords ↓
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia20161 station, 3.59 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%201620182020WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia 2016: 40%Reef Check 2020: 8.8%Reef Check 2020: 10%Reef Check 2020: 47%Reef Check 2020: 48%Reef Check 2020: 51%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2019: 53%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (3 years)
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia Reef Check Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 6 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 10 surveys between 2016 and 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (53%) sits 2 points above the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (8.8–51%), inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WWF-US / WWF-IndonesiaTNK06201640%3.59 kmAmkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2016. Komodo MPA. MERMAID
Reef CheckMawan (Sector 1)202010% (3.1–18%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020)0.34 km—
Reef CheckMawan (Sector 2)20208.8%0.34 km—
Reef CheckSiaba Besar (Sector 1)202051% (44–59%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020)1.65 km—
Reef CheckSiaba Besar (Sector 2)202047% (41–52%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020)1.65 km—
Reef CheckPengah Kecil (Sector 1) SW Side202048% (39–57%, 2 surveys, Mar–Aug 2020)1.88 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.