Coral Reef Diagnostics

Indonesia - Komodo NP: Pink Beach (Pantai Merah)

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2019-01-24
Coordinates
-8.6039, 119.5184
Coral cover
25%
Claude computer vision (71 edited photos) · other methods below · median 18%
Observations
bleachingdebris
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — East Nusa Tenggara virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoEast Nusa Tenggara (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
117
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

A ripping-current drift in Komodo along a complex wall with 20-40% hard coral, fluorescent green needle corals, and acres of soft corals, with sergeant majors by the thousands and a lush hard and soft coral garden under a pier. Fewer corals were bleached here than at the previous site, and the sandy critter section nearby held virtually no coral.

Max. depth dived
25.6 m
Water temp. during survey
26.3°Cii (dive note: 24–25°C)
-1.6°C vs the 2019 mean sea temperature (27.9°C)
ii Mean of the dive-computer average water temperatures of the 3 logged dives on 24 January 2019 (26.1, 26.2 and 26.5°C; dive log); Anderson's notes read 24-25°C, 25°C and 26.1°C.

8 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

67891011121314151617192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142444546474950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The first dive (11:29) was a ripping current dive. We kept getting swept off the main wall part of the reef, but we eventually encountered corals (hard and soft) as we drifted along. Visibility was 10 m. The water temperature was 24-25°C. We actually had to relocate after 1-2 minutes to find a place with less current. Reef ended at 15-17 m in most places, but extended down to 25-30 m in one particularly lush area. The reef ended in sand, so staying on it was a struggle. The afternoon critter-section dive was very calm, 25°C, 10-m viz.

General benthic features

Anderson's dive log lists Seriatopora caliendrum and Stylophora pistillata among the most common corals at the site (e.g., Image 3).

Eventually we started drifting and encountered acres upon acres of soft corals interspersed with seriatoporids and acroporids (e.g., Image 4).

Finally we reached large chunks of hard coral again. Soft coral was prevalent in abundance at all depths. Tubastraea, Pocillopora acuta (e.g., Image 1), and Isopora grew in a beautiful mixed community of hard and soft corals at 5-6 m.

There were some small poritids and large Acropora colonies at 3-4 m. We reached a pier with a beautiful hard and soft coral garden at its base, extending below 10 m. The afternoon critter-section dive (15:08) found virtually no corals, just a sandy slope with all manner of cool critters. In 2-4 m, there were some corals, including an impressive Porites bommie and some Acropora. Galaxea, a flounder, and a crab wearing a sponge that was too big for it were also seen.

Coral cover

Stressors

On the first dive, most Seriatopora caliendrum and Stylophora pistillata colonies were fluorescent green or normal yellow/orange (e.g., Image 2); Anderson logged that fewer were bleached than at the previous site.

The few Seriatopora caliendrum seen on the critter-section dive were sickly looking. On the night dive, Anderson's photographs show litter on the reef: a printed white cup or package wedged under a ledge and a crumpled printed can on the sand beside a cuttlefish (e.g., Image 51, Image 52).

One brown branching colony has about half its branches stark white, with a sharp boundary and no algal film, recent mortality, cause not stated (e.g., Image 48).

Fish and other fauna

High density and diversity of small reef fish, though only a few large snapper were seen. A white crab, totally camouflaged, lived in the soft coral. Sergeant majors were present by the thousands (e.g., Image 5).

There were plenty of upside-down jellyfish, one of which was bouncing down the slope. Two beautiful pipefish were seen, one of which was disguised as algae. A remora was seen, the first of the trip. A dogtooth tuna was seen. Other sightings were an enormous jellyfish, two species of cuttlefish (one large and one small), and two species of squid, including the trip's lone large (30 cm) squid. Also seen were eels (2-3 species), tiny pipefish, a large snail, and a huge crab.

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys confirmed at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

The main dive was dive 2 of 24 January 2019 (trip dive 21). It ran from 11:29 to 12:31 (62 min). Maximum depth was 25.6 m. The average water temperature was 26.1°C. The breathing gas was 30% oxygen. The critter-section dive was dive 3 of 24 January 2019 (trip dive 22). It ran from 15:08 to 16:09 (61 min). Maximum depth was 20.1 m. The average water temperature was 26.2°C. The night dive was dive 4 of 24 January 2019 (trip dive 23). It ran from 18:57 to 19:52 (55 min). Maximum depth was 16.2 m. The average water temperature was 26.5°C (Anderson's note gives 26.1°C). The breathing gas was 30% oxygen.

CV model comparison

Mean 25%, median 18% across 71 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. Trip dive 22 (Pink Beach round 2, the sandy critter section) was a muck/macro dive over sand and is not included in the cover value; neither is the night dive. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv330.0n = 71 · SE 1.6
CoralSCOP edited37.3n = 71 · SE 2.3
Claude (edited photos)24.8n = 71 · SE 2.7

The two computer-vision methods differ by 7.3 pp (30.0–37.3%) and read 5.2–12.5 pp above Claude's blind point count (24.8%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Dive history

DateTime inMax depth (m)Bottom time (min)
2019-01-2411:2925.662
2019-01-2415:0820.161
2019-01-2418:5716.255

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.