Coral Reef Diagnostics

Indonesia - Komodo NP: Pengah Kecil

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2009-08-18
2019-01-25
Coordinates
-8.5450, 119.6300
Coral cover
30%
Claude computer vision (37 edited photos) · other methods below
Observations
not yet tagged for this site
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — East Nusa Tenggara virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoEast Nusa Tenggara (NOAA CRW virtual station) · Lesser Sunda ecoregion mean=6.9°C-heating weeks
Photographs
37
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Pengah Kecil is a submerged pinnacle carrying near-continuous, densely packed digitate and corymbose Acropora with abundant anthias overhead - among the best coral of the trip, according to Anderson's own log, despite a 2019 dive aborted after 20 minutes in violent upwelling and rip currents. No bleaching or disease is visible. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 30%.

Max. depth dived
27.1 m

Six independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Six other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

5 of these 37 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

A submerged pinnacle Anderson dived in August 2009 (to 27.1 m) and again on 25 January 2019, when he had to abort after 20 minutes in what he called every manner of water motion conceivable - upwelling, downwelling, washing-machine, surge, and rip.

General benthic features

He wrote that he needed to check his pictures because the coral was among the best of the trip, and the frames settle it. The brightest frame is a slope at effectively continuous cover: mint-green, teal, and tan digitate and corymbose Acropora packed shoulder to shoulder with plating colonies and a lavender foliose plate, crinoids in the gaps, and dozens of orange anthias and a red bigeye in the water in front of it (e.g., Image 2).

A dimmer wide frame is denser still and more varied: teal and mustard Acropora, purple-brown foliose plates, rust-red plating colonies with blue growing margins, a pale massive dome - with two long horizontal tabulate plates at the top of the frame that look dead and turf-covered, the only clear mortality in the set (e.g., Image 1).

Foliose corals carry two frames: a wall of stacked pale gray-lavender foliose tiers above a teal corymbose Acropora and a brown meandroid brain coral, with a blue Linckia starfish alongside; and a frame whose lower half is ruffled brown foliose plates with a gray brain coral, a mustard tabulate plate, and chartreuse branching coral above - almost certainly the vase-like foliaceous corals he admired but could not name (e.g., Image 3, Image 5).

The close frame is broad brown plating sheets with white tubercles, a teal Acropora recruit, a blue vase sponge, and red encrusting sponge (e.g., Image 4).

Coral cover

Coral cover: 30% — a blind Claude computer-vision point count of 37 of Anderson's edited photographs (20 points per photo; water, fish, and obstructions excluded). Other computer-vision methods are listed in the method table. Anderson is still comparing computer-vision models, and these figures will be updated as the methods improve. As of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement.

Stressors

No bleaching, disease, or man-made objects. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Comparisons with other data

Also on record for this site: 2019-1-25 dive 3: Pengeh Kecil (#26): 15:25-15:45 (20 min). Had to abort dive early on account of currents (20 minutes). Seriatopora hystrix, diverse and abundant Acropora, Montipora, stinging hydroids (got stung), vase-like foliaceous corals=beautiful (forgot name).

CV model comparison

As of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs (Anderson, 2026-09-27: Claude CV is the main coral-cover value).
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. Coralscapes v2 and v1 were also run but are not shown: Anderson does not consider Coralscapes reliable for these photos. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
In-house DINOv330.5
CoralSCOP edited36.2
Claude (edited photos)29.9

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Reef Check20205 stations, 1.75–2.05 kmRecords ↓
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia20161 station, 3.66 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%201620182020WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia 2016: 40%Reef Check 2020: 8.8%Reef Check 2020: 10%Reef Check 2020: 47%Reef Check 2020: 48%Reef Check 2020: 51%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2019: 30%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-2.12 pp per year, not separable from zero; 3 years)
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia Reef Check Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 6 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 11 surveys between 2016 and 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (30%) sits within the range of these surveys (8.8–51%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WWF-US / WWF-IndonesiaTNK06201640% (2 surveys)3.66 kmAmkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2016. Komodo MPA. MERMAID
Reef CheckPengah Kecil (Sector 1) SW Side202048% (2 surveys)1.75 km—
Reef CheckMawan (Sector 1)202010% (2 surveys)1.79 km—
Reef CheckMawan (Sector 2)20208.8%1.79 km—
Reef CheckSiaba Besar (Sector 1)202051% (2 surveys)2.05 km—
Reef CheckSiaba Besar (Sector 2)202047% (2 surveys)2.05 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.