Part of the regional summary: Indonesia - Komodo

Bonsai Rock splits into two faces: a near-monospecific, unbroken field of pale lavender Acropora at 5 m, thick with red-orange anthias, giving way to more algal-dominated, low-relief stretches; Anderson's log records live coral cover still high at 20-25 m and low relief attributed to strong current. No bleaching or disease was seen in the photo review, though a computer-vision point count scored 1.0% of coral as bleached. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 18%.
Bonsai Rock terbagi menjadi dua sisi: hamparan Acropora lavender pucat yang hampir monospesifik dan tak terputus pada kedalaman 5 m, dipenuhi ikan anthias merah-oranye, lalu berganti menjadi bentangan berelief rendah yang lebih didominasi alga; log Anderson mencatat tutupan karang hidup masih tinggi pada kedalaman 20-25 m dan relief rendah yang dikaitkan dengan arus kuat. Tidak terlihat pemutihan atau penyakit dalam tinjauan foto, meskipun penghitungan titik visi komputer menilai 1.0% karang memutih. Penghitungan titik buta visi komputer Claude memperkirakan tutupan karang sekitar 18%.
Terjemahan ringkasan ini oleh AI; versi bahasa Inggris yang berlaku.
5 of the 48 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
Two wide frames capture the two faces of this reef that Anderson's notes describe. The first is the spectacular one: a near-continuous field of pale lavender-gray corymbose and digitate Acropora, running unbroken to the limit of visibility, with hundreds of red-orange anthias hanging above it and a rust-brown soft-coral bush and chartreuse patches for contrast — Anderson's most impressive corals at 5 m, and effectively a monospecific stand at that scale (e.g., Image 5).
The second is the other end: a dim, hazy, low-relief slope under a school of yellowtail fusiliers, where the substrate is mostly dark red-brown turf and encrusting algae with only scattered cream corymbose Acropora, small foliose plates, and blue vase sponges — consistent with Anderson's note that the reef eventually became more algal-dominated, and with the further reading in those notes that low relief here reflects strong current (e.g., Image 3).
Anderson's dive log adds that at 5-10 m the hard coral community became more complex (small massive poritids, Pocillopora eydouxi, Pocillopora acuta, Seriatopora hystrix, and Diploastrea), that Acropora grew to just below the surface (0.5 m), that live coral cover was still high at 20-25 m with high coral diversity at 20 m, that many plating coral species were new to the diver, and that the deep wall was dominated in many places by non-coral invertebrates. A close substrate frame shows the same thing at 30 cm: a small lavender knobby pocilloporid colony surrounded by brown and orange encrusting algae and turf, red macroalgae, small tunicates, and one cream mushroom coral (e.g., Image 1).
The photo review found no bleaching, no disease lesions, and nothing man-made; however, a computer-vision point count called 1.0% of coral points bleached (1 of 66 photos). No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.
Two macro frames show the invertebrate life: a large nudibranch, teal with a bold black reticulate pattern and rounded tubercles, on pink crustose coralline algae; and a second, black with a brilliant blue marginal line and blue-tipped appendages, crossing pale sponges (e.g., Image 2, Image 4).
Anderson's log also records very high fish biomass in places, though the fish were mostly small.
We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
One dive, 22 January 2019, 07:52, 58 minutes, max 27.7 m by Anderson's log, 26.7°C (dive-computer average; the note calls it cold, 25-26°C), and 10 m visibility, called poor.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 26.5 | n = 66 · SE 1.3 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 37.7 | n = 66 · SE 2.9 |
| Claude (edited photos) | 17.5 | n = 66 · SE 2.3 |
The two computer-vision methods disagree by 11.2 pp (26.5–37.7%) and read 9.0–20.2 pp above Claude's blind point count (17.5%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.