Coral Reef Diagnostics

Bonaire - Hilma Hooker

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2017-02-24
Coordinates
12.1045, -68.2879
Position from the published dive-site listings for the Hilma Hooker wreck, which agree; no GPS fix was logged on the dive.
Coral cover
19%
Claude computer vision (31 edited photos) · other methods below · median 17%
Observations
shipwreckrecent mortality
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Aruba, Curacao, and Bonaire virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoAruba, Curacao, and Bonaire (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
54
42 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

The Hilma Hooker wreck lies on its side in about 30 m of water, its hull crusted with sponges (very few, if any, corals grow on the wreck itself) and patrolled by barracuda and grunts, and the neighboring reef adds boulder corals, gorgonians, and extensive staghorn thickets. Context (dive-operator and press sources): the wreck is a 236-foot (72 m) freighter seized for drug smuggling that sank at anchor in 1984 while held as evidence.

Max. depth dived
31.1 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
26.4°C
-1.5°C vs the 2017 mean sea temperature (27.9°C)
Bottom time
49 min
in at 08:37

Ten independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

11 of the 42 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

68910111213141516181920232426272930313234353638434447484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Context (dive-operator and press sources): the Hilma Hooker is a 236-foot (72 m) inter-island freighter, seized as a drug-smuggling vessel in 1984, that took on water and sank at anchor on 12 September 1984 while held as evidence; it now rests on its side in about 100 ft (30 m) of water on a sandy bottom near a coral reef. The Hilma Hooker set covers three linked habitats: the wreck itself, the surrounding sand apron, and the adjacent reef (e.g., Image 2).

General benthic features

The steel hull and railings are crusted with sponges, with very few (if any) corals growing on the wreck itself, and a memorial plaque lies nearby; the wreck is patrolled by barracuda and schools of grunts, with boulder corals and gorgonians on the adjacent reef (e.g., Image 7, Image 21).

The reef includes massive and lobate corals, brain corals, and octocorals (e.g., Image 3, Image 4), and extensive staghorn-coral thickets (Acropora cervicornis, Anderson's identification) (e.g., Image 22, Image 25).

Adjacent reef scenes are patchy but retain substantial live coral and octocoral structure, with no broad bleaching signal. The staghorn thickets contain abundant branch structure; photo review cannot reliably separate every live branch from old dead framework at distance.

Coral cover

Stressors

One brain colony on the sand at the reef edge carries several small, clean-white patches of bare skeleton within otherwise pigmented tissue: recent mortality, cause not stated (e.g., Image 17, Image 28).

No corallivores were evident.

Fish and other fauna

Barracuda, tarpon, parrotfish, and large fish schools use both reef and wreck habitat (e.g., Image 1, Image 5).

Comparisons with other data

de Bakker et al. (2019) surveyed this site (station 21), 0.05 km from the pin. Within 5 km, ten independent stations recorded station-year means of 6.0–51% hard coral cover between 2004 and 2017; the nearest of these, Steneck et al. (2019) at Bachelor's Beach, 0.65 km away, read 32–48% between 2009 and 2017.

Other notes

The wreck frames are not evidence of benthic reef condition.

CV model comparison

Mean 19%, median 17% across 31 reef photos (the 5 wreck-hull frames are excluded).
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision, a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoOther rows are for comparison only and are never averaged. No diver transect exists for these photos, so agreement between rows is not accuracy.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
CoralSCOP edited18.8n = 53 · SE 2.4
Claude (edited photos)18.6n = 31 · SE 2.5

CoralSCOP (edited photos) reads 18.8%, within 0.2 pp of Claude's blind point count (18.6%).

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Steneck et al. (2019)2004–20175 stations, 0.65–4.04 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20135 stations, 1.33–4.86 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%200420102017Steneck et al. (2019) 2004: 34%Steneck et al. (2019) 2004: 44%Steneck et al. (2019) 2005: 45%Steneck et al. (2019) 2005: 51%Steneck et al. (2019) 2007: 42%Steneck et al. (2019) 2007: 42%Steneck et al. (2019) 2009: 32%Steneck et al. (2019) 2009: 32%Steneck et al. (2019) 2009: 36%Steneck et al. (2019) 2009: 40%Steneck et al. (2019) 2009: 43%Steneck et al. (2019) 2011: 24%Steneck et al. (2019) 2011: 33%Steneck et al. (2019) 2011: 33%Steneck et al. (2019) 2011: 39%Steneck et al. (2019) 2011: 42%Steneck et al. (2019) 2013: 17%Steneck et al. (2019) 2013: 26%Steneck et al. (2019) 2013: 35%Steneck et al. (2019) 2013: 38%Steneck et al. (2019) 2013: 39%Steneck et al. (2019) 2015: 27%Steneck et al. (2019) 2015: 32%Steneck et al. (2019) 2015: 34%Steneck et al. (2019) 2015: 36%Steneck et al. (2019) 2015: 38%Steneck et al. (2019) 2017: 35%Steneck et al. (2019) 2017: 44%Steneck et al. (2019) 2017: 45%Steneck et al. (2019) 2017: 45%Steneck et al. (2019) 2017: 48%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 6.0%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 13%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 14%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 15%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 16%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2017: 19%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (8 years)
Steneck et al. (2019) XL Catlin Seaview Survey Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 10 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 136 records between 2004 and 2017. Of the 5 stations surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined (by 1.0 points), 3 increased (by 11–16 points), and 1 changed by less than 1 point between their first and latest surveys. Two stations share the longest span (2004–2017); one, 18th Palm (Steneck et al. 2019, 1.74 km away), went from 34% in 2004 (mean of 8 records) to 45% in 2017 (mean of 4 records). The most recent nearby survey is from 2017, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (19%) sits within the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (13–48%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Steneck et al. (2019)18th Palm2004–201727–45% (range of yearly means; 36 records)1.74 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00265
Steneck et al. (2019)Windsock2004–201738–51% (range of yearly means; 36 records)2.17 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00265
Steneck et al. (2019)Bachelor's Beach2009–201732–48% (range of yearly means; 20 records)0.65 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00265
Steneck et al. (2019)Calabas2009–201724–36% (range of yearly means; 20 records)2.84 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00265
Steneck et al. (2019)Front Porch2009–201717–45% (range of yearly means; 19 records)4.04 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00265
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 17042201313%1.33 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 17044201315%3.50 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 1704320136.0%3.70 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 17041201314%4.77 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 17045201316%4.86 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Steneck RS, Arnold SN, Boenish R, de León R, Mumby PJ, Rasher DB, et al. (2019). Managing Recovery Resilience in Coral Reefs Against Climate-Induced Bleaching and Hurricanes: A 15 Year Case Study From Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean. Frontiers in Marine Science 6:265. PDF
  2. de Bakker DM, van Duyl FC, Perry CT, Meesters EH (2019). Extreme spatial heterogeneity in carbonate accretion potential on a Caribbean fringing reef linked to local human disturbance gradients. Global Change Biology 25:4092-4104. DOI
  3. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI