Part of the regional summary: Timor-Leste

A shallow Atauro coral garden with essentially no bare substrate and a broad mix of growth forms: columnar and lobate corals, branching and plating Acropora, mauve bushy branching corals, and big tube-sponge clusters. Two giant clams, one beneath a large maze-patterned brain coral, are wedged into the framework.
Jardín ahu-ruin ida la kle'an iha Atauro ne'ebé besik la iha substratu mamuk, ho forma kresimentu oioin: ahu-ruin kolunar no lobadu, Acropora ho sanak no plaka, ahu-ruin ho sanak barak hanesan ai-oan, kór-malva (mauve), no grupu esponja-tubu (tube sponge) boot sira. Kima boot (giant clam) rua, ida iha ahu-ruin-kakutak (brain coral) boot ida nia okos ho padraun hanesan labirintu, tama metin iha estrutura ahu-ruin nia laran.
AI translation of this summary; the English is authoritative. (low confidence)
Twelve independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Eight other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
5 of the 21 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
The first photograph is a coral garden with essentially no bare substrate: thick blunt-fingered columnar colonies in gray-brown and lavender, a dense brown corymbose Acropora mound, cream and lilac digitate and corymbose colonies, a mauve-purple corymbose colony in the near corner, pale yellow-green massive lobate corals and dark lobate heads behind, and — on the right margin — a cluster of orange-brown tube sponges with red interiors (e.g., Image 1).
The second wide frame is a shallower, brighter field of bushy cream and tan branching Acropora running to a blue horizon, with a large brown tube-sponge complex mid-frame, two black feather stars, maroon algal turf and coralline in the interstices, a butterflyfish, an orange-and-dark anemonefish-type damselfish, and dozens of chromis and a surgeonfish silhouetted in the water above (e.g., Image 2).
Across the gallery photographs: high living cover, strong fine- and coarse-scale relief, abundant crustose coralline algae, and no disease lesion or predation scar visible. A computer-vision point count called 1.6% of coral points bleached (13 of 193 photos). Sand, rubble, and pale hardground remain visible in channels between coral outcrops. The repeated wide views show locally high living-coral cover and substantial fine- and coarse-scale structural complexity.
The selections do not show a conspicuous site-wide bleaching pattern, but pale-to-white patches and small dead or overgrown lesions recur across roughly a fifth of the reviewed frames (a count that takes pale patches and lesions together; the computer-vision count, which scores bleaching alone, found it in 13 of 193 photos, 6.7%) — more than an isolated occurrence, though still short of a uniform reef-wide signal. The photographs also document a large giant clam embedded among the living coral (e.g., Image 3, Image 4), and a crown-of-thorns seastar was photographed on this dive (e.g., Image 21).
A fouled, algae-encrusted rope lay draped over the top of a large brown massive colony and hung down its face, a derelict line (photo not shown).
A black-and-yellow butterflyfish crosses the frame and small dark damselfishes shelter in the branches (e.g., Image 1). The two close frames among the four reviewed in detail both feature giant clams (Tridacna sp., fluted shells) wedged into the framework: one with a mottled cream-and-black mantle beneath a large maze-patterned brain coral, the other with a dark blue-green striated mantle and a gaping siphon, flanked by a large cream-tentacled sea anemone that shelters a small anemonefish, with fine-corallite massive corals to one side and pale pink verrucose branching colonies above (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).
We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, twelve independent stations recorded station-year means of 13–65% hard coral cover between 2004 and 2017; the nearest, Coral Triangle Center (CTC) at Beloi (10), 0.77 km away, read 49% in 2017.
Inner Reef was dived on 30 January 2024, a shallow profile to 12.2 m maximum and 6.4 m average.
The two wide frames among the four reviewed in detail show dense cover and many growth forms.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 38.4 | n = 193 · SE 0.7 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 52.6 | n = 193 · SE 1.4 |
| Claude (edited photos) | 44.6 | n = 193 · SE 1.5 |
The two computer-vision methods disagree by 14.2 pp (38.4–52.6%) and read on both sides of Claude's blind point count (44.6%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coral Triangle Center (CTC) | 2017 | 3 stations, 0.77–3.60 km | Records ↓ |
| Reef Check | 2004–2017 | 6 stations, 0.86–4.68 km | Records ↓ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2014 | 3 stations, 0.78–4.94 km | Records ↓ |
Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)Within 5 km, 12 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 15 surveys between 2004 and 2017. The most recent nearby survey is from 2017, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (45%) sits within the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (17–65%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reef Check | South of Tanjung Reta | 2004 | 33%, mean of 2 surveys (5.8 m and 12 m) | 2.92 km | — |
| Reef Check | North of Tanjung Reta | 2004 | 44%, mean of 2 surveys (7.1 m and 13 m) | 4.68 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 30015 | 2014 | 21% | 0.78 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 30014 | 2014 | 17% | 1.42 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 30013 | 2014 | 13% | 4.94 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| Coral Triangle Center (CTC) | Beloi (10) | 2017 | 49% | 0.77 km | Currier K, Marine P, Welly M. 2017. Atauro Island MPA. MERMAID |
| Reef Check | Haru ina | 2017 | 53%, mean of 2 surveys (9 m and 16 m) | 0.86 km | — |
| Coral Triangle Center (CTC) | Outer Reef (09) | 2017 | 41% | 0.93 km | Currier K, Marine P, Welly M. 2017. Atauro Island MPA. MERMAID |
| Reef Check | Rai keta tungu | 2017 | 65% | 1.44 km | — |
| Reef Check | Watu ai | 2017 | 49% | 2.11 km | — |
| Reef Check | Rai keta rala | 2017 | 39% | 2.11 km | — |
| Coral Triangle Center (CTC) | Vila (11) | 2017 | 36% | 3.60 km | Currier K, Marine P, Welly M. 2017. Atauro Island MPA. MERMAID |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.