Reef Check Foundation
Coral Reef Diagnostics

Atauro - Compass Reef snorkel

Coral Triangle Center (CTC)
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2024-01-31
2024-02-01
Coordinates
-8.2296, 125.6104
Coral cover
38%
Claude computer vision (99 edited photos) · other methods below · median 39%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoTimor-Leste (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
126
22 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

A shallow Atauro garden snorkeled in about 2 m of water, including the densest frame of this set: pink, orange, and cream colonies packed edge to edge with almost no bare rock. One pale gray-white branching colony stands out among its pigmented neighbors, though a photograph cannot say whether it is bleaching.

Max. depth (snorkel)
2 m
snorkel visit, no dive log; Anderson's estimate
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
30.0°C
mean; range 30.0–30.1°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST), mean of the 2 survey dates (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Timor-Leste), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef

Eleven independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Seven other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

10 of the 22 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

91011121314151617181920

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

The South frames show a shallow garden of remarkable density. One is filled by a single large pale blue-gray corymbose Acropora colony, its plates interlocking above dark shadowed voids, with olive-green branching colonies, small gray lobate Porites, and a honeycomb faviid crowding in from the edges and green algal tufts in the gaps (e.g., Image 1).

A second is a wide view over big salmon-pink corymbose Pocillopora-like domes, mauve-pink plating colonies, a tan maze-patterned brain coral, gray-lavender lobate Porites heads, a pale yellow-green foliose colony, and background thickets of tabulate and staghorn Acropora, with a bright teal parrotfish and several damselfishes passing through (e.g., Image 2).

A third is the densest frame of the set: orange-brown, pink-mauve, and cream corymbose colonies, purple encrusting plates, fine branching thickets, mushroom corals, and knobby pale Porites packed edge to edge with almost no bare substrate — and one distinctly pale gray-white branching colony among pigmented neighbors, which from a photograph alone cannot be separated into pale pigment, bleaching, or recent mortality (e.g., Image 3).

The fourth South frame is the counterpoint: a coarse coral-shell sand plain with red and orange encrusting sponges on scattered rubble, no live coral, and a dark knobbed sea star with blue tubercles (a Protoreaster-type) crossing it (e.g., Image 4).

The house-reef frames are shallower and flatter. One is again a dense, high-diversity garden — cream domes of massive Porites, a textured Hydnophora-like mound with sinuous white ridges, a small pale table Acropora, pink corymbose colonies, pale honeycomb faviids, and dark plating colonies (e.g., Image 7).

The other three show the flat's real character: small massive, lobate, and cerioid colonies scattered across pale sediment-veneered pavement and rubble, with green algal turf, branching coralline tufts, small pale Acropora colonies, and genuine seagrass shoots on the sand between them (e.g., Image 6, Image 8).

Different growth forms are tightly interleaved in many frames, producing strong fine-scale structural complexity (e.g., Image 5).

Living cover here is patchy and massive-dominated rather than continuous.

Coral cover

Stressors

One low knobby colony had a stark cream-white center with its knobs intact, grading to pigmented gray-green and lavender-pink margins: a partly bleached colony (31 January snorkel) (e.g., Image 21).

Two neighboring massive colonies have pale cream crowns above normally pigmented brown sides, while a brain-form colony beside them is evenly pigmented: partial paling (bleaching) of their upper surfaces (31 January snorkel) (e.g., Image 22).

No uniform, reef-wide bleaching signal is apparent. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.

Fish and other fauna

Sea stars are conspicuous mobile invertebrates, including a black species with blue-tipped tubercles and an orange-and-black knobbed individual (photo not shown), and a bright-blue five-armed Linckia-type sea star on a massive colony (photo not shown).

Comparisons with other data

The XL Catlin Seaview Survey covered a nearby station (transect 30015) in 2014, 0.46 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Within 5 km, eleven independent stations recorded station-year means of 17–65% hard coral cover between 2004 and 2017; the nearest, Reef Check at Rai keta tungu, 0.42 km away, read 65% in 2017.

Dive record

Snorkeled twice, on 31 January and 1 February 2024, in about 2 m of water — and the first eight photographs come from two spots, four frames at Compass Reef South and four on the Compass house reef.

CV model comparison

Mean 38%, median 39% across 99 photos.
More infoA few low-cover photos (sand, rubble, or open bottom) pull the mean down; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv330.5n = 99 · SE 1.0
CoralSCOP edited48.9n = 99 · SE 1.9
Claude (edited photos)38.0n = 99 · SE 2.2

The two computer-vision methods disagree by 18.4 pp (30.5–48.9%) and read on both sides of Claude's blind point count (38.0%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Dive history

DateTime inMax depth (m)Bottom time (min)
2024-01-31—2.0—
2024-02-01—2.0—

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Coral Triangle Center (CTC)20173 stations, 0.53–2.49 kmRecords ↓
Reef Check2004–20176 stations, 0.42–4.34 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20142 stations, 0.46–2.37 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%200420142024Reef Check 2004: 33%Reef Check 2017: 25%Reef Check 2017: 39%Reef Check 2017: 49%Reef Check 2017: 53%Reef Check 2017: 65%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2014: 17%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2014: 21%Coral Triangle Center (CTC) 2017: 36%Coral Triangle Center (CTC) 2017: 41%Coral Triangle Center (CTC) 2017: 49%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2024: 38%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (4 years)
Reef Check XL Catlin Seaview Survey Coral Triangle Center (CTC) Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 11 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 15 surveys between 2004 and 2017. The most recent nearby survey is from 2017, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (38%) sits within the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (21–65%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Show all 15 independent surveys
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckSouth of Tanjung Reta200433%, mean of 2 surveys (5.8 m and 12 m)3.90 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 30015201421%0.46 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 30014201417%2.37 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Reef CheckRai keta tungu201765%0.42 km—
Coral Triangle Center (CTC)Beloi (10)201749%0.53 kmCurrier K, Marine P, Welly M. 2017. Atauro Island MPA. MERMAID
Reef CheckWatu ai201749%1.00 km—
Reef CheckRai keta rala201739%1.01 km—
Reef CheckHaru ina201753%, mean of 2 surveys (9 m and 16 m)1.34 km—
Coral Triangle Center (CTC)Outer Reef (09)201741%1.42 kmCurrier K, Marine P, Welly M. 2017. Atauro Island MPA. MERMAID
Coral Triangle Center (CTC)Vila (11)201736%2.49 kmCurrier K, Marine P, Welly M. 2017. Atauro Island MPA. MERMAID
Reef CheckVila South201725% (3 surveys)4.34 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.