Reef Check Foundation
Coral Reef Diagnostics

Atauro - Biqueli Wall

Coral Triangle Center (CTC)
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2024-01-30
Coordinates
-8.1874, 125.6385
Approximate position.
Coral cover
27%
Claude computer vision (147 edited photos) · other methods below · median 25%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoTimor-Leste (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
183
23 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Although named for its wall, the first photographs reviewed from this Atauro dive show the upper terrace: a near-continuous field of tan branching Acropora under hundreds of damselfish and fusiliers. Patches of dead Acropora rubble crusted in pink coralline algae, one with a blue sea star, sit among the living thickets.

Max. depth dived
30.8 m
Water temp. during survey
28.0°Cii
-1.0°C vs the 2024 mean sea temperature (29.0°C)
ii Average water temperature of the logged dive (dive log); the dive computer's minimum was 27.8°C.
Bottom time
59 min
in at 08:31

Nine independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Four other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

7 of the 23 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567891011121314151617181920

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Although the site is named for its wall, the first four photographs reviewed document the upper terrace rather than the drop-off. Taken together the frames show excellent visibility, high branching-Acropora cover, and exceptional small-fish abundance in the shallows, alongside at least one substantial coralline-bound rubble field. Because the reviewed images do not document the full drop-off, this is an account of the photographed upper reef at Biqueli Wall, not a complete characterization of the wall itself. In three consecutive frames a taut blue line rises from near the top of one bommie into the water column; what kind of line it is cannot be told from the photographs.

General benthic features

Frame by frame: the first is a broad wide-angle over a near-continuous field of tan corymbose and digitate Acropora, mound after mound of fine branching growth running to a flat horizon, with an enormous aggregation of small planktivorous fishes — damselfishes and fusilier-like schools numbering in the hundreds — filling the entire water column above it; a single block of pale dead skeleton crusted in pink coralline sits in the near foreground (e.g., Image 1).

The second is the same habitat in better light: wall-to-wall corymbose Acropora with pale branch tips sloping gently into clear blue, again with a dense cloud of dark-green damselfishes hovering over the thicket and hundreds more strung out into the blue (e.g., Image 2).

The third frame is a close view of the other extreme — a blue sea star consistent with Linckia laevigata lying across a consolidated bed of dead Acropora branch rubble entirely encrusted in pink and mauve crustose coralline algae, with red encrusting growth and a few small green ascidians and sponges, and no living coral in the frame at all (e.g., Image 3).

The fourth is a coral-dense pavement at mid relief: a large mauve-pink digitate colony with blunt, pale-tipped fingers dominates the center, flanked by dark brown massive lobate Porites, tan honeycomb-textured faviid brain corals, pale branching growth, a black feather star tucked into a crevice, and a few dark damselfishes (e.g., Image 4).

Sand, pale framework, and rubble channels separate the denser patches. Black feather stars (crinoids) recur constantly on bommie tops throughout the sequence, and barrel, tube, and encrusting sponges are a regular presence, though neither is a dominant visual feature.

Coral cover

Stressors

Anderson photographed two bleached branching colonies on this dive: one stark white throughout among pigmented brown colonies, and one with a large stark-white center ringed by pigmented tan branches (e.g., Image 21, Image 22).

A computer-vision point count called 1.9% of coral points bleached (10 of 147 photos). Image 23 documents a single live table coral isolated within a broad field of dead rubble — a striking contrast that hints at real reef degradation in at least part of the photographed area.

No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.

Fish and other fauna

Small reef fishes occur above the coral, while individual bommies support several growth forms within a compact area.

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, nine independent stations recorded station-year means of 13–61% hard coral cover between 2004 and 2017; the nearest, Reef Check at North of Tanjung Reta, 0.13 km away, read 44% in 2004.

Dive record

Biqueli Wall was dived on 30 January 2024, in at 08:31 for 59 minutes, 30.8 m maximum and 12.2 m average depth, average water temperature 28.0°C (dive-computer minimum 27.8°C).

CV model comparison

Mean 27%, median 25% across 147 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv330.2n = 147 · SE 1.0
CoralSCOP edited38.4n = 147 · SE 1.6
Claude (edited photos)27.4n = 147 · SE 1.7

The two computer-vision methods differ by 8.2 pp (30.2–38.4%) and read 2.8–11.0 pp above Claude's blind point count (27.4%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Coral Triangle Center (CTC)20172 stations, 4.22–4.27 kmRecords ↓
Reef Check2004–20175 stations, 0.13–4.63 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20142 stations, 0.41–3.25 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%200420142024Reef Check 2004: 25%Reef Check 2004: 33%Reef Check 2004: 44%Reef Check 2017: 53%Reef Check 2017: 61%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2014: 13%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2014: 17%Coral Triangle Center (CTC) 2017: 35%Coral Triangle Center (CTC) 2017: 41%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2024: 27%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (4 years)
Reef Check XL Catlin Seaview Survey Coral Triangle Center (CTC) Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 9 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 13 surveys between 2004 and 2017. The most recent nearby survey is from 2017, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (27%) sits within the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (13–44%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckNorth of Tanjung Reta200444%, mean of 2 surveys (7.1 m and 13 m)0.13 km—
Reef CheckSouth of Tanjung Reta200433%, mean of 2 surveys (5.8 m and 12 m)1.71 km—
Reef CheckSouth of Barstool200425%, mean of 2 surveys (6.6 m and 12.4 m)2.02 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 30013201413%0.41 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 30014201417%3.25 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Coral Triangle Center (CTC)Baroana (08)201735%4.22 kmCurrier K, Marine P, Welly M. 2017. Atauro Island MPA. MERMAID
Coral Triangle Center (CTC)Outer Reef (09)201741%4.27 kmCurrier K, Marine P, Welly M. 2017. Atauro Island MPA. MERMAID
Reef CheckHaru ina201753%, mean of 2 surveys (9 m and 16 m)4.33 km—
Reef CheckUaro-Ana (Baru-ana)201761%4.63 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.