Coral Reef Diagnostics

Alor - Sulambali Wall

Komodo Dragon Liveaboards — Naga Biru
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2026-08-03
Coordinates
-8.2751, 124.3444
Coral cover
22%
Claude computer vision (208 photos) · other methods below
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — East Nusa Tenggara virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoEast Nusa Tenggara (NOAA CRW virtual station) · Lesser Sunda ecoregion mean=6.9°C-heating weeks Alor and the Pantar Strait sit in a zone of exceptionally strong upwelling, which holds these reefs several degrees cooler than NOAA’s satellite-derived figures imply. Read the heat-stress numbers here as a regional-scale indication, not as this reef’s own temperature history.
Photographs
54
Site summary
Read this summary in:

A steep upper slope rolling over into a near-vertical Alor wall, where the standout habitat is meter-scale fields of stacked plating corals, one carpeted in thousands of red anthias. Live coral is genuinely patchy, with large aprons of dead, coralline-bound branching rubble and sand chutes between the live stands.

Max. depth dived
26.1 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
26.5°Cii
-2.1°C vs the 12 months to 2026-08 mean sea temperature (28.6°C)
ii range midpoint
Bottom time
56 min
in at 07:31
Dive setting
Sloping Reef / Wall · Beginner

Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Five other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

22 of these 54 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

347810111214151619202225283132343536374041424445464749505354

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The first frames are close and out of focus, then the profile resolves into a steep upper slope that rolls over into a near-vertical wall, shot repeatedly with open blue on one side (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 26).

General benthic features

The deep and mid wall is encrusting rather than framework-building: pink and magenta crustose coralline algae, red, orange, yellow, lilac, and blue encrusting sponges, tunicates, and turf, punctuated by stacked foliose plates (e.g., Image 6, Image 9, Image 21, Image 23).

Those plate beds are the standout habitat here - meter-scale fields of overlapping whorls compatible with Montipora, Turbinaria, Echinopora, and Pachyseris, one field carpeted in red Pseudanthias (e.g., Image 5, Image 29, Image 30).

Large aprons of dead branching-coral rubble, bleached white and bound by coralline algae, run along the upper wall between the live stands, and pale sand chutes cut through repeatedly - live coral is genuinely discontinuous at this site (e.g., Image 27, Image 33).

Also present: blue-gray finger and tube sponges, orange and brown barrels of Xestospongia form, tan feather-hydroid and gorgonian plumes, black and yellow feather stars, two blue Linckia laevigata, a sea cucumber, and mauve host anemones with anemonefish (e.g., Image 52).

The shallow reef top is a different community again: green, tan, and brown tabulate Acropora tables, broad staghorn and corymbose Acropora thickets, Pocillopora, massive Porites, meandering Platygyra/Dipsastraea and Lobophyllia, Fungia, and continuous pulsing xeniid and Sarcophyton/Sinularia soft-coral meadows (e.g., Image 13, Image 18, Image 24, Image 39, Image 43).

Coral cover

Coral cover: 22% — a blind Claude computer-vision point count of 208 of Anderson's unedited photographs (20 points per photo; water, fish, and obstructions excluded). Other computer-vision methods are listed in the method table.

Stressors

Condition is mixed rather than uniformly good: no basin-wide bleaching, but one large massive dome is almost entirely white and several smaller colonies carry white patches, alongside the extensive older rubble (e.g., Image 17, Image 48).

A thin white monofilament line or rope appears on the wall in at least four frames (e.g., Image 38).

No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Fish and other fauna

Fish: red anthias in thousands, dark damselfish shoals over the drop-off, yellow-and-blue fusiliers, butterflyfishes, surgeonfishes, and three tight silverside baitballs (e.g., Image 51).

Comparisons with other data

Also on record for this site: A steep drop-off connected to a broad upper slope. Sand and rubble channels separated patchy to locally high coral cover, and the shallower frames became increasingly mixed and coral-rich.

Other notes

The last frame is topside on the liveaboard. Also on record for this site: A steep drop-off connected to a broad upper slope.

CV model comparison

As of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs (Anderson, 2026-09-27: Claude CV is the main coral-cover value).
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. Coralscapes v2 and v1 were also run but are not shown: Anderson does not consider Coralscapes reliable for these photos. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
In-house DINOv325.1
CoralSCOP unedited16.3
Claude22.3

Independent surveys nearby

Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 2014. The most recent nearby survey is from 2014, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (22%) sits within the range of these surveys (8.0–24%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia5003201424% (2 surveys)2.14 kmAmkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2015. MBD 2014 & 2015. MERMAID
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia500220148.0% (4 surveys)4.79 kmAmkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2015. MBD 2014 & 2015. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.