Coral Reef Diagnostics

Alor - Pasir Merah (Red Sand)

Komodo Dragon Liveaboards — Naga Biru
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2026-07-29
Coordinates
-8.2886, 124.3200
Coral cover
16%
Claude computer vision (174 photos) · other methods below · median 14%
Observations
fishing gear
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — East Nusa Tenggara virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoEast Nusa Tenggara (NOAA CRW virtual station) Alor and the Pantar Strait sit in a zone of exceptionally strong upwelling, which holds these reefs several degrees cooler than NOAA’s satellite-derived figures imply. Read the heat-stress numbers here as a regional-scale indication, not as this reef’s own temperature history.
Photographs
175
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Named for its rust-red sand and rubble plain, this Alor site grades into a patchy, low-relief coral garden of massive Porites and brain corals alternating with open white sand. Anemones with anemonefish and a large school of chromis along the reef edge were photographed.

Max. depth dived
22.7 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
25–26°C
Water-temperature range logged on the dive (25-26°C, the author's dive notes).
Bottom time
57 min
in at 14:52
Dive setting
Sloping Reef / Wall · Beginner

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Five other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

These are unedited originals; edited versions will replace them.

This page shows 50 of the 175 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.

23 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

1346911141519202425262829313334353637384143454647

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

A heterogeneous volcanic slope of sand, rubble, and red or pink encrusted substrate interspersed with coral outcrops (e.g., Image 5, Image 7, Image 23).

Visibility is good throughout with strong ambient light. A reef-to-wall transition with locally enhanced water movement; the gas vents reported for the site were not clearly captured (e.g., Image 27).

General benthic features

The opening frames confirm the site's name: a reddish-brown sediment/rubble plain (a mix of fine sand and small coral fragments giving it a distinctive rust-red hue) with only isolated small coral colonies (a pale mounding head, a purple encrusting patch, small faviid heads) and a black damselfish with an orange-tipped tail (e.g., Image 16, Image 51).

Further along the dive, the habitat becomes a dense low-relief coral garden: massive Porites and Platygyra-type brain corals with maze-like grooved surfaces, foliose plating colonies with pale rims, and large anemones (one brown carpet-type, one smaller) each hosting anemonefish (e.g., Image 2, Image 17, Image 21, Image 40).

Black bushy growth consistent with black coral, a maroon/purple crinoid feather star, and a blue Linckia sea star recur on the reef structure (e.g., Image 30, Image 44).

Coral cover is patchy rather than uniform: dense clusters of massive and plating corals alternate with open white sand patches hosting only scattered small colonies, consistent with a mixed sand/coral mosaic rather than continuous reef framework (e.g., Image 22, Image 32, Image 42).

Coral cover

Stressors

Fishing gear: a woven-bamboo fish trap (bubu) sits on the reef slope behind a large leather coral (e.g., Image 10), and thin trap lines run over the reef and up into the water column on at least seven frames along the dive; one, fouled with algae, lies draped across colonies.

One gray-white to stark-white lobed patch is a mix of recently dead soft and hard corals, cause unclear (e.g., Image 55).

Other colonies show normal brown/tan/olive pigmentation, with white growing rims on plate margins. A computer-vision point count called 0.2% of coral points bleached (1 of 174 photos), which the photographs could not confirm. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.

Fish and other fauna

Anthias, chromis, and other damselfishes were locally dense above the slope (e.g., Image 18, Image 39, Image 54).

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, one independent station, WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia at station 5003, 0.99 km away, read 24% in 2014.

Regional context, not a survey of this site: Razak et al. (2026) found no significant trend in hard coral cover around Alor (a decline of 0.6% per year at 23 sites, surveyed by point-intercept transect at about 8–10 m in 2014, 2017, 2021, and 2023 by Yayasan WWF Indonesia); this is a trend for that location, not this site’s cover. Cover at those sites fell by 3% between the 2014 and 2017 surveys, which bracket 75 days of NOAA Bleaching Alert Level 1 from December 2016 to February 2017.

Other notes

One wide frame shows a large school of dozens of small dark fish (chromis/damsel-type) streaming along the reef edge in blue water with two divers visible in the distance (e.g., Image 8, Image 12, Image 13).

CV model comparison

Mean 16%, median 14% across 174 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv325.9n = 174 · SE 0.6
CoralSCOP unedited16.3n = 174 · SE 0.8
Claude16.1n = 174 · SE 1.0

The two computer-vision methods differ by 9.6 pp (16.3–25.9%) and read 0.2–9.8 pp above Claude's blind point count (16.1%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2014. The most recent nearby survey is from 2014, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (16%) sits 8 points below the one nearby survey station (24%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia5003201424%0.99 kmAmkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2015. MBD 2014 & 2015. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Razak TB, Alisa CAG, Abrar M, Ardiwijaya R, Bachtiar I, Budaya RR, et al. (2026). Two decades of coral monitoring reveal thermal stress thresholds on Indonesian reefs. Biological Conservation 318:111781. DOI