Coral Reef Diagnostics

Alor - Clown Valley

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2026-07-30
Coordinates
-8.3168, 124.3685
Approximate position.
Coral cover
41%
Claude computer vision (209 photos) · other methods below · median 43%
Observations
fishing gear
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — East Nusa Tenggara virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoEast Nusa Tenggara (NOAA CRW virtual station) Alor and the Pantar Strait sit in a zone of exceptionally strong upwelling, which holds these reefs several degrees cooler than NOAA’s satellite-derived figures imply. Read the heat-stress numbers here as a regional-scale indication, not as this reef’s own temperature history.
Photographs
213
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

An Alor slope that grades from encrusted rock and rubble near the entry to extensive thickets of dense staghorn and digitate Acropora, with a low canopy of plating corals in between. Anthias and a school of unicornfish hang over the reef; no bleaching or disease was seen in the photo review, though a computer-vision point count scored 0.1% of coral as bleached.

Max. depth dived
27.1 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
23–24°C
Water-temperature range logged on the dive (23-24°C, the author's dive notes).
Bottom time
58 min
in at 07:24
Dive setting
Sloping Reef · Beginner

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Five other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

These are unedited originals; edited versions will replace them.

This page shows 50 of the 213 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.

18 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

148910111315161820212223242527282930313233343536373839404344

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

A reef slope with a strong gradient from encrusted rock and rubble near the entry to extensive, dense branching-coral thickets further along. Visibility is good throughout with strong ambient light (e.g., Image 2).

General benthic features

Early frames show a mixed substrate of purple/maroon encrusting sponge or coralline patches over rubble and dead coral fragments, with a low mound of small-polyp branching coral (gray-green) at the margin (e.g., Image 3).

Mid-dive frames are dominated by foliose/cup-shaped coral colonies with pale rims forming an almost continuous low canopy interspersed with red and maroon foliose algae (cf. Halymenia), a heart-shaped salmon-pink encrusting sponge, and scattered massive brain/faviid coral (e.g., Image 14, Image 17, Image 42).

A striking green encrusting/plating colony (possibly stressed or naturally pigmented) sits beside gray encrusting sponge and red algae, with a diver's exhaust bubbles visible in the background (e.g., Image 6, Image 19).

Multiple wide frames further into the dive show dense, low-relief staghorn/digitate Acropora-type thickets stretching wall-to-wall across the frame, hosting anthias and small reef fish, with massive coral boulders and brain corals as occasional structural breaks; two divers are visible swimming over one such thicket (e.g., Image 5, Image 12, Image 41).

A broad slope with pronounced variation in coral cover. Apparently shallower sections later in the dive supported dense branching thickets that greatly increased structural complexity, separated elsewhere by rubble, hardground, and older dead framework (e.g., Image 46).

Coral cover

Stressors

The photo review saw no bleaching or disease, and colonies show normal pigmentation (browns, grays, greens, and the one notably green plating colony); however, a computer-vision point count called 0.1% of coral points bleached (2 of 209 photos). Fishing gear: a woven-bamboo fish trap (bubu) lies on the reef slope among branching and massive colonies, a wooden pole with a thin line lies across a staghorn thicket as a trap marker, and a taut yellow rope crosses the branching-coral slope (e.g., Image 51, Image 52, Image 53).

One brown plating-massive colony carries about ten small white spots of bare skeleton, several beside small borer holes: small recent-mortality or bite spots, cause not visible (e.g., Image 54).

No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.

Fish and other fauna

A mid-water frame records a school of unicornfish/surgeonfish silhouetted in blue water above the reef. Host anemones, leather and other soft corals, sponges, crinoids, and red encrusting growth were frequent, and anthias, chromis, other damselfishes, butterflyfishes, and surgeonfishes occupied the slope (e.g., Image 7, Image 26, Image 47).

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, one independent station, WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia at station 5002, 0.75 km away, read 8.0% in 2014.

Regional context, not a survey of this site: Razak et al. (2026) found no significant trend in hard coral cover around Alor (a decline of 0.6% per year at 23 sites, surveyed by point-intercept transect at about 8–10 m in 2014, 2017, 2021, and 2023 by Yayasan WWF Indonesia); this is a trend for that location, not this site’s cover. Cover at those sites fell by 3% between the 2014 and 2017 surveys, which bracket 75 days of NOAA Bleaching Alert Level 1 from December 2016 to February 2017.

CV model comparison

Mean 41%, median 43% across 209 photos.
More infoA few low-cover photos (sand, rubble, or open bottom) pull the mean down; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv331.6n = 209 · SE 0.7
CoralSCOP unedited22.4n = 209 · SE 1.3
Claude41.0n = 209 · SE 1.4

The two computer-vision methods differ by 9.2 pp (22.4–31.6%) and read 9.4–18.6 pp below Claude's blind point count (41.0%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2014. The most recent nearby survey is from 2014, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (41%) sits 33.0 points above the one nearby survey station (8.0%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia500220148.0%0.75 kmAmkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2015. MBD 2014 & 2015. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Razak TB, Alisa CAG, Abrar M, Ardiwijaya R, Bachtiar I, Budaya RR, et al. (2026). Two decades of coral monitoring reveal thermal stress thresholds on Indonesian reefs. Biological Conservation 318:111781. DOI