Coral Reef Diagnostics

Alor - Bakalang Jetty

Komodo Dragon Liveaboards — Naga Biru
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2026-07-29
Coordinates
-8.2676, 124.2992
Coral cover
7.6%
Claude computer vision (51 photos) · other methods below · median 0.0%
Observations
debris
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — East Nusa Tenggara virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoEast Nusa Tenggara (NOAA CRW virtual station) Alor and the Pantar Strait sit in a zone of exceptionally strong upwelling, which holds these reefs several degrees cooler than NOAA’s satellite-derived figures imply. Read the heat-stress numbers here as a regional-scale indication, not as this reef’s own temperature history.
Photographs
121
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

A muck and jetty site over dark volcanic sand in Alor, where old wooden pilings are sheathed top to bottom in orange, red, and cream sponges, a black bushy growth consistent with black coral, and a white sea fan. Between the pilings, branching coral hosts damselfish, and macro finds include a spectacular black-and-orange Chromodoris-type nudibranch and an anemone shrimp on a tube anemone.

Max. depth dived
22.3 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
26–27°C
Water-temperature range logged on the dive (26-27°C, the author's dive notes).
Bottom time
63 min
in at 10:54
Dive setting
Muck / Coral · Beginner

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

These are unedited originals; edited versions will replace them.

This page shows 50 of the 121 photographs from this site, including every one cited by image number in the text; the frames the text describes as not shown are not among them.

20 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

12491012141619222425262829303132343637384041424344454749

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

A muck/jetty site over dark volcanic sand and rubble with old wooden pilings (e.g., Image 3, Image 15).

General benthic features

Two frames show the pilings themselves, encrusted top to bottom in orange, red, and cream tube/encrusting sponges, with a black bushy growth (consistent with black coral, Antipatharia), a translucent lavender ball-cluster of eggs or a colonial ascidian, a delicate white gorgonian sea fan hanging below one crossbeam, and a diver with a slate/pointer working the structure; visibility in these frames is workable but hazy/particulate, typical of a silty muck site (e.g., Image 21, Image 27, Image 46, Image 48).

On the sand/rubble bottom between pilings, a branching thicket hosts small blue-and-yellow damselfish (photo not shown), alongside a dense low mound of finger-like beige coral with purple-tipped branches and a separate low staghorn-type cluster; sponge-covered rock blocks (e.g., Image 13) and a red branching colony carrying a black crinoid (e.g., Image 54) also sit on the bottom.

A large sea anemone with long, white-tipped tentacles shelters a juvenile domino damselfish (compatible with Dascyllus trimaculatus), a damselfish that, like anemonefishes, often lives among anemone tentacles (e.g., Image 55).

Scattered hard corals included branching Acropora, massive Porites, fungiids, merulinid brain corals, and large-polyp forms compatible with Euphyllia (e.g., Image 39, Image 50, Image 53).

The pilings were heavily colonized by orange, red, and blue sponges, hydroids, crinoids, and soft corals, creating vertical habitat above sand and rubble (e.g., Image 23).

Coral cover

Stressors

One large-polyp hard coral colony was paling (partial bleaching): its tentacle crowns were pale cream-white over still-pigmented tan tissue (e.g., Image 56).

Litter: two printed plastic snack wrappers lay on the bottom, one among coral beside a giant clam (e.g., Image 11) and one in the rubble below a sponge (e.g., Image 18).

No disease or physical damage is visible on any coral colony in this sample.

Fish and other fauna

Close macro frames show: a spectacular Chromodoris-type nudibranch (black body, orange-rimmed white-and-black banded mantle, orange gill plume) on pink encrusting sponge/coralline rock; a burrowing/feather-duster-type tube anemone with pale tentacles fringed in maroon dots around a dark mouth; a colorful anemone shrimp (red-and-white banded) clinging to a burrowing cerianthid's tube alongside pale green branching coral tips; a dark, elongated sea cucumber lying across rubble; and two macro shots of massive brain-type coral surface detail, one closeup with a distinct grass-green polyp coloration and the other pale cream-green with visible septal ridges, neither showing bleached white tissue or lesions (e.g., Image 20).

Macro subjects included conspicuous chromodorid and phyllidiid nudibranchs, among them a Phyllidia varicosa-type form, plus anemones and small cryptic fishes (e.g., Image 17, Image 33, Image 35).

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, one independent station, WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia at station 5003, 3.41 km away, read 24% in 2014.

Regional context, not a survey of this site: Razak et al. (2026) found no significant trend in hard coral cover around Alor (a decline of 0.6% per year at 23 sites, surveyed by point-intercept transect at about 8–10 m in 2014, 2017, 2021, and 2023 by Yayasan WWF Indonesia); this is a trend for that location, not this site’s cover. Cover at those sites fell by 3% between the 2014 and 2017 surveys, which bracket 75 days of NOAA Bleaching Alert Level 1 from December 2016 to February 2017.

CV model comparison

Mean 7.6%, median 0.0% across 51 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv315.8n = 51 · SE 1.3
CoralSCOP unedited18.1n = 51 · SE 2.7
Claude7.6n = 51 · SE 1.5

The two computer-vision methods agree within 2.3 pp (15.8–18.1%) and read 8.2–10.5 pp above Claude's blind point count (7.6%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2014. The most recent nearby survey is from 2014, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (7.6%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km.

Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia5003201424%3.41 kmAmkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2015. MBD 2014 & 2015. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Razak TB, Alisa CAG, Abrar M, Ardiwijaya R, Bachtiar I, Budaya RR, et al. (2026). Two decades of coral monitoring reveal thermal stress thresholds on Indonesian reefs. Biological Conservation 318:111781. DOI