Coral Reef Diagnostics

Alor - Babylon

Komodo Dragon Liveaboards — Naga Biru
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2026-08-01
2026-08-02
Coordinates
-8.2234, 124.3640
Coral cover
30%
Claude computer vision (415 photos) · other methods below · median 24%
Observations
possible bleachingfishing gear
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — East Nusa Tenggara virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoEast Nusa Tenggara (NOAA CRW virtual station) Alor and the Pantar Strait sit in a zone of exceptionally strong upwelling, which holds these reefs several degrees cooler than NOAA’s satellite-derived figures imply. Read the heat-stress numbers here as a regional-scale indication, not as this reef’s own temperature history.
Photographs
416
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

An Alor site of wall plus complex coral outcrops separated by sand and rubble, dived on two days that covered different ground. The second dive crossed a near-continuous field of ruffled foliose (leafy) plate corals, while elsewhere barrel sponges, sea fans, soft corals, and anthias fill a patchier reef.

Max. depth dived
30.1 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
25–26°C
Water-temperature range logged on each of the two dives (25-26°C, the author's dive notes).
Dive setting
Wall · Beginner

Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

These are unedited originals; edited versions will replace them.

This page shows 50 of the 416 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.

17 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

2567910121718192022232425262728303133343537394042434445464748

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Dive 1 (1 August 2026): The first of two dives here, on the wall and the complex coral outcrops separated by sand and rubble (e.g., Image 1, Image 4, Image 32, Image 36).

Dive 2 (2 August 2026): The second visit covered a longer progression and a visibly different part of the site.

General benthic features

Hard corals included branching and tabular Acropora, Pocillopora, foliose and encrusting Montipora, massive Porites, Turbinaria, fungiids, and merulinid brain corals (e.g., Image 13, Image 29, Image 38, Image 50).

Large barrel sponges, leather and other soft corals, gorgonians, crinoids, and red coralline or sponge-like encrusting growth occupied the wall faces and the spaces between colonies (e.g., Image 8, Image 11, Image 14, Image 41).

Structural complexity and coral cover increased locally toward denser shallow gardens but remained spatially discontinuous. Wall and outcrop habitat again held massive Porites, Montipora/Pachyseris plates, Turbinaria, fungiids, and merulinids with barrel sponges, crinoids, gorgonians, and soft corals — but large later sections crossed a near-continuous field of ruffled foliose (leafy) plate corals before returning to mixed bommies and rubble (e.g., Image 15, Image 21, Image 49); branching colonies grow among them in places (e.g., Image 16).

This leafy-plate habitat is the reason the two Babylon dives are worth separating.

Coral cover

Stressors

A few massive colonies were partly bleached on both dives: on 2 August one large rounded colony was cream-white over most of its surface and brown only along one margin, and another had a broad gray-white center inside a brown rim; on 1 August one pale lobe sat beside brown lobes of the same colony (three of Anderson's photographs, not shown). Fishing gear: a woven-bamboo fish trap (bubu) with a bait bag hung on a rope against the wall on 1 August, and long ropes and blue lines, likely trap lines, ran across the reef in several 2 August frames (Anderson's photographs).

Fish and other fauna

Anthias, chromis, other damselfishes, butterflyfishes, and surgeonfishes were the most conspicuous fish groups (e.g., Image 3).

Comparisons with other data

WWF-US and WWF-Indonesia surveyed a nearby station (station 5004) in 2014, 0.24 km from the pin. Within 5 km, two independent stations (WCS Indonesia via MERMAID and WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia) recorded station-year means of 0.0–53% hard coral cover between 2014 and 2025; the nearest, WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia at station 5004, 0.24 km away, read 53% in 2014.

Regional context, not a survey of this site: Razak et al. (2026) found no significant trend in hard coral cover around Alor (a decline of 0.6% per year at 23 sites, surveyed by point-intercept transect at about 8–10 m in 2014, 2017, 2021, and 2023 by Yayasan WWF Indonesia); this is a trend for that location, not this site’s cover. Cover at those sites fell by 3% between the 2014 and 2017 surveys, which bracket 75 days of NOAA Bleaching Alert Level 1 from December 2016 to February 2017.

Dive record

Two dives were made here, on 1 and 2 August 2026.

CV model comparison

Mean 30%, median 24% across 415 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv330.5n = 415 · SE 0.5
CoralSCOP unedited20.6n = 415 · SE 0.9
Claude30.0n = 415 · SE 1.2

The two computer-vision methods differ by 9.9 pp (20.6–30.5%) and read on both sides of Claude's blind point count (30.0%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Dive history

DateTime inMax depth (m)Bottom time (min)
2026-08-0115:2026.961
2026-08-0214:1930.163

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
WCS Indonesia via MERMAID20251 station, 1.93 kmRecords ↓
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia20141 station, 0.24 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%201420202026WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia 2014: 53%WCS Indonesia via MERMAID 2025: 0.0%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2026: 30%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (3 years)
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia WCS Indonesia via MERMAID Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 2 surveys between 2014 and 2025. One survey since 2021 recorded 0.0%. This site's own estimate (30%) sits 30.0 points above the recent value (0.0%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WWF-US / WWF-Indonesia5004201453%0.24 kmAmkieltiela, Abdillah T, Amkieltiela A, Andradi-Brown D, Lazuardi E. 2015. MBD 2014 & 2015. MERMAID
WCS Indonesia via MERMAID100120250.0%1.93 kmNurhayati. 2025. Ikan aya. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Razak TB, Alisa CAG, Abrar M, Ardiwijaya R, Bachtiar I, Budaya RR, et al. (2026). Two decades of coral monitoring reveal thermal stress thresholds on Indonesian reefs. Biological Conservation 318:111781. DOI