2,228 geocoded studies that actually evaluated an intervention · 2,610 study×intervention rows
Intervention type
Setting
Lab / modelled / literature studies carry the
lab's coordinates, not a reef — that is why they land in Europe. A probiotic
developed in Germany and tested on a reef shows at the reef only if the paper was
coded field or mixed.
Tested robustly in the field, with
replication and appropriate controls.
No single location, so no pin — a global
synthesis or a national programme review does not belong at one reef. Tick this to add them
to the table below.
Rigor
BACI = Before–After–Control–Impact:
the site is measured both before and after the intervention and against an
untreated control site. It is the only common design that separates the intervention from
background change, which is why so few studies qualify. Control + baseline = BACI + before/after + inside/outside. This is about study
design, not location — it is independent of the Setting filter above. A reef
study with no control or baseline is field-tested but cannot attribute cause.
Coral survival & growth data
Studies that report survival or growth of reef-building
corals, read from the full text (2026). Their efficacy is taken from those results; a verdict
needs a comparison: an untreated control, a before/after baseline, a reference site or
another method. Use Rigor above to keep only stronger designs.
Color by
For studies with coral survival or
growth data, efficacy comes from their reported results, checked against the full text. All
other verdicts were read from the abstract and are not yet verified. Only meaningful on the
causal-design tier — switch Rigor above.